BRIS-5

Tailor patient information to individual needs, circumstances, and wishes

Bristol Heart Inquiry · Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 18 July 2001

Government responseNot tracked (historical inquiry)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Information should be tailored to the needs, circumstances and wishes of the individual.

Bristol Heart Inquiry, Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · 18 Jul 2001 Source PDF →

Government response

●No formal government response recorded

The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

Having the information to share with patients and carers / parents is an important part of the care process and is available through various means, as set out in our responses to Recommendations 1 (patient-centred care), 2 (shared decision-making) and 4 (patient information).

Additionally:

• Since 1 August 2016, all organisations that provide NHS care and/or publicly funded adult social care have been legally required to follow the Accessible Information Standard, in accordance with section 250(6) of the Health and Social Care Act 2012. The Accessible Information Standard sets out a consistent approach to identifying, recording, flagging, sharing and meeting the information and communication support needs of patients, service users, carers and parents with a disability, impairment or sensory loss.
• The GMC’s guidance on decision making and consent, as referenced in our response to Recommendation 1, asks doctors to consider using visual or other explanatory aids to support patients to understand their personalised risk, taking account of their individual clinical and personal circumstances, compared with population level risk. • NHS England has worked with the Patient Information Forum to develop a new standard for creating digital health content (2022). This is based on the principle that good content can save lives, and when content is clear, accurate, evidence-based, up to date and easy to use, it helps people self-care or know when and where to get the help and care they need.

• NICE produced guidance focusing on patient experience which includes guidance around communication with patients.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented – Ongoing .”. Table row: section 6.2 No. 5, PDF page 72-73.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

The Government agreed with this recommendation.

In its January 2002 response, the Department of Health said that from April 2003 information would be made available through a new National Knowledge Service in a number of languages aimed at different levels of understanding.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 6.2 No. 5, PDF page 74.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.