Reorganisation due diligence
Vale of Leven Inquiry · The Vale of Leven Hospital Inquiry Report · Issued 24 November 2014 · Addressed to: NHS Health Boards (Scotland)
Government responseScottish Government: Accepted (Jun 2015)
DeliveryNo statement from NHS Health Boards (Scotland) found
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
In any major structural reorganisation in the NHS in Scotland a due diligence process including risk assessment should be undertaken by the Board or Boards responsible for all patient services before the reorganisation takes place. Subsequent to that reorganisation regular reviews of the process should be conducted to assess its impact upon patient services, up to the point at which the new structure is fully operational. The review process should include an independent audit.
Vale of Leven Inquiry, The Vale of Leven Hospital Inquiry Report · 24 Nov 2014 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Inquiry asked health boards to conduct due diligence before major structural reorganisations. The Scottish Government stated in June 2015 that it accepted all of the report's recommendations in full, but it did not describe action on risk assessments, regular reviews of patient services, or independent audits (Scottish Government response, Jun 2015).
Sources
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 1 Oct 2026.
Report-level response context
Government response
●Scottish Government · Accepted · 18 Jun 2015
The Scottish Government accepts its responsibility for the failings identified in the report and we apologise unreservedly for the suffering and loss caused. We accept in full all of the report's recommendations.
Extract from: The Scottish Government's Response to the Vale of Leven Hospital Inquiry Report
Delivery
No statement on delivery from NHS Health Boards (Scotland) has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.