Reconsider LGA Guide paragraph 79.11 advice
Grenfell Tower Inquiry · Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report · Issued 4 September 2024 · Addressed to: UK Government
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
That the advice contained in paragraph 79.11 of the LGA Guide be reconsidered. (113.83)
Grenfell Tower Inquiry, Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report · 4 Sep 2024 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:
- Residential PEEPs: Guidance for Responsible Persons was published on 2 December 2024, replacing the redacted LGA Guide paragraph 79.11 advice (Residential PEEPs: Guidance for Responsible Persons, MHCLG, December 2024).
- The government's dashboard states this recommendation is complete and has been fully discharged (Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Recommendations Dashboard, MHCLG, updated March 2026).
Response — verbatim from government
●UK Government — initial response
The government accepts this recommendation. The advice contained in paragraph 79.11 of the LGA Guide was redacted in 2021. The Home Office intends to publish new guidance on the issues covered in paragraph 79.11 in 2025.
UK Government · 16 Jan 2025 Written response →
●UK Government — follow-up
The government accepts this recommendation. The advice contained in paragraph 79.11 of the LGA Guide was redacted in 2021. The Home Office intends to publish new guidance on the issues covered in paragraph 79.11 in 2025.
UK Government · 26 Feb 2025 Written response →
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
- 1 Feb 2026 The guidance on the issues covered in paragraph 79.11 in the LGA Guide was published on 2 December, as the Residential PEEPs: Guidance for Responsible Persons. This recommendation is now closed and has been fully discharged. Source →
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.