P2-45 Accepted

Add humanitarian considerations as ninth response principle

Grenfell Tower Inquiry · Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report · Issued 4 September 2024 · Addressed to: UK Government

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

That regard for humanitarian considerations be expressly recognised by making it the ninth principle of effective response and recovery. (113.69)

Grenfell Tower Inquiry, Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report · 4 Sep 2024 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The government accepted this recommendation in February 2025, committing to factor it into the resilience review outcomes (Government Response to Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report, MHCLG, February 2025).
- The government's annual report stated the Cabinet Office developed a National Resilience Standard on Human Aspects supporting responders and Local Resilience Forums (Annual Report on Progress, MHCLG, February 2026).

Response — verbatim from government

UK Government — initial response

The government accepts this recommendation. We will fully factor it into the outcomes of the resilience review.

UK Government · 16 Jan 2025 Written response →

UK Government — follow-up

The government accepts this recommendation. We will fully factor it into the outcomes of the resilience review.

UK Government · 26 Feb 2025 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 1 Feb 2026 The Cabinet Office developed a National Resilience Standard on Human Aspects supporting responders and Local Resilience Forums in addressing psychosocial needs of emergency-affected individuals. Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.