Home / Inquiries / Grenfell Tower Inquiry / P2-18
← P2-17 P2-19 →
P2-18

Develop fire engineering courses for construction professionals

Grenfell Tower Inquiry · Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report · Issued 4 September 2024 · Addressed to: UK Government

Government responseUK Government: Accepted (Feb 2025)

DeliveryMinistry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says in progress (Sep 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

That the government, working in collaboration with industry and professional bodies, encourage the development of courses in the principles of fire engineering for construction professionals and members of the fire and rescue services as part of their continuing professional development. (113.28)

Grenfell Tower Inquiry, Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report · 4 Sep 2024 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In September 2026, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government reported that the recommendation remains in progress, having established the Fire Engineers Transitional Board to provide expert advice on the next phase of reform (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026). The department stated in September 2026 that identifying a suitable approach to courses for other construction professionals is scheduled for late 2026, with implementation planned to begin between October and December 2027 (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Sep 2026).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The record above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Government response

●UK Government · Accepted · 26 Feb 2025

Words of: HM Government, Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report: Government response (CP 1248), presented to Parliament by the Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, 26 February 2025

The government accepts this recommendation. We recognise the importance that the principles of fire engineering can have for these professions and others. We will work with industry and professional bodies to consider how best to encourage the development of courses.

Extract from: Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report: Government response (HTML version)

Site note: This is the government's response to the Phase 2 report (CP 1248, published 26 February 2025). It prints each recommendation and then the response to it. Where the recommendation is addressed to a body outside government, the response prints that body's own acceptance (the Architects Registration Board and RIBA, HMICFRS, London Fire Brigade, the National Fire Chiefs Council, the British Standards Institution, the National Police Chiefs' Council), and the row is filed under that body.

Delivery

●Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says in progress · 10 Sep 2026

Timeline for delivery
2025
- Government sets out plans for next steps on the recommendations concerning the fire engineer profession. – Complete
2026
- Sufficient progress made on recommendations 15, 16 and 17 to enable identification of a suitable approach to courses for other construction professionals. – (Q4, Oct to Dec)
2027
- Implementation begins. – (Q4, Oct to Dec)

From: Progress report September 2026: implementation timeline for Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommendations (part of Grenfell Tower Inquiry Government Progress Report: September 2026)

Site note: This is the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government's progress report of September 2026 on the Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommendations. Where the passage describes work by another body, such as the National Fire Chiefs Council, London Fire Brigade, fire and rescue services, the British Standards Institution or the Cabinet Office, it is the Ministry's account of that body's progress, and the row is filed under the Ministry.

Earlier statements on delivery (0)

●Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government · 10 Sep 2026

In recent months we have established the Fire Engineers Transitional Board to provide expert support and advice to MHCLG during the next phase of reform for the fire engineering profession. Along with representation from the devolved governments, the board is comprised of experienced regulators, representatives from professional bodies, and expert advisers:

- Dr Barbara Lane

- Prof Jose Torero

- Prof Luke Bisby

- Lynsey Seal

- Ben Bradford

- Architects Registration Board (primary representative: Simon Howard)

- Building Safety Regulator (primary representatives: Charles-Elie Romeyer; Karen Holmes)

- Engineering Council (primary representative: Paul Bailey)

- Institution of Fire Engineers (primary representative: Steve Hamm)

- Royal Academy of Engineering (primary representative: Natasha McCarthy)

- National Fire Chiefs Council (primary representative: Richard Clark)

Further information about the role of the board can be found in the next steps statement, which sets out the department’s planned approach to recommendations 15, 16 and 18.

In support of recommendation 16, £13 million funding is currently available to UK higher education institutions through an open competitive process, to increase capacity of fire engineering professionals. Award winners will be tasked to use the funds to increase higher education provision, provide studentships for masters places and boost research and academic capacity in fire engineering.

From: Progress report September 2026: the construction industry (part of Grenfell Tower Inquiry Government Progress Report: September 2026)

Site note: This is the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government's progress report of September 2026 on the Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommendations. Where the passage describes work by another body, such as the National Fire Chiefs Council, London Fire Brigade, fire and rescue services, the British Standards Institution or the Cabinet Office, it is the Ministry's account of that body's progress, and the row is filed under the Ministry.

●Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government · 25 Feb 2026

Throughout the year we have made progress toward regulating the fire engineering profession. In May we engaged a panel of industry and academic, and regulatory experts to advise on the expectations of a competent fire engineer and the implementation of the recommendations.

By September, the panel had begun drafting an authoritative statement, with engagement across professional bodies, fire and rescue services and commercial organisations, and in December, we published the authoritative statement alongside a next steps paper. The papers set out key principles for future regulation and outline how we intend to take forward reform, informing future consultations and implementation planning.

Recommendation 17 is complete and has been fully discharged.

From: Annual Report February 2026: the construction industry (part of Grenfell Tower Inquiry Government Annual Report: February 2026)

Site note: This is the annex of the government's Phase 2 annual report (CP 1512, published 25 February 2026) as GOV.UK publishes it, one page per theme: the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government's account. Where the passage describes work by another body, such as the National Fire Chiefs Council, London Fire Brigade, the British Standards Institution, the Health and Safety Executive or the Cabinet Office, it is the report's account of that body's progress, and the row is filed under the Ministry. The status is what the passage says: completed only where it says the recommendation is complete or closed.

Site note: The source gives this passage once, for recommendations 15, 16, 17 and 18 together. The same words are recorded on P2-15, P2-16, P2-17 and P2-18. The passage ends by saying that recommendation 17 is complete; the other three are shown as in progress.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.