P2-12 Accepted

Clarify BS 9414 limitations requiring fire engineer assessment

Grenfell Tower Inquiry · Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report · Issued 4 September 2024 · Addressed to: UK Government

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

BS 9414 should be approached with caution and we recommend that the government make it clear that it should not be used as a substitute for an assessment by a suitably qualified fire engineer. (113.18)

Grenfell Tower Inquiry, Grenfell Tower Inquiry: Phase 2 Report · 4 Sep 2024 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The government accepted this recommendation in February 2025, stating it will be addressed through the Approved Document B review (Government Response to Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report, MHCLG, February 2025).
- The government's annual report stated this is part of the statutory guidance review, with an expert panel appointed on 31 July 2025 guiding the BSR-led review and comprehensive recommendations expected in 2026 (Annual Report on Progress, MHCLG, February 2026).
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Claude (Anthropic) on 10 Apr 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)

Response — verbatim from government

UK Government

The government accepts this recommendation. We will address this through the response to recommendation 5.

UK Government · 26 Feb 2025 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 1 Feb 2026 Part of statutory guidance review. Expert panel appointed 31 July 2025 guiding BSR-led review; comprehensive recommendations expected 2026. (Covers Recommendations 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12.) Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.