Cold water survivability modelling
Cranston Inquiry · The Cranston Inquiry Report · Issued 5 February 2026 · Addressed to: HM Coastguard
Government responseDepartment for Transport: Accepted (Jul 2026)
DeliveryCabinet Office says completed (Oct 2026)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
HM Coastguard should examine whether it is using the most appropriate modelling for survivability in cold water. HM Coastguard should amend its existing policies to ensure that they consistently identify the key variables about which information is to be collected from people in the water. In the event that the number of people in the water makes information gathering more difficult, HM Coastguard's policies should prioritise the collection of the key variables.
Cranston Inquiry, The Cranston Inquiry Report · 5 Feb 2026 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Inquiry asked HM Coastguard to review its cold water survivability modelling and information policies. In October 2026, the Cabinet Office reported that the recommendation had been marked as complete based on an ongoing approach, with the Maritime and Coastguard Agency establishing internal monitoring and reporting (Cabinet Office, Oct 2026). Earlier, in July 2026, the Department for Transport stated that the model used adheres to international guidance and that standard operating procedures prioritise key information collected from people in the water (Department for Transport response, Jul 2026). The department added that ongoing collaboration with the United States Coast Guard is sharing immersion data to assess whether international guidance should be updated (Department for Transport response, Jul 2026).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 16 Oct 2026.
Government response
●Department for Transport · Accepted · 16 Jul 2026
HMCG have carefully considered and confirmed it is using the most appropriate model for survivability in cold water. This is because it adheres to the internationally set guidance from the IMO within IAMSAR (Volume 2) and aligns with guidance produced from the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee. The model HMCG uses is supported by a SOP which draws upon the IAMSAR guidance to predict the time people can survive in cold water under a range of different scenarios. SOPs for people in the water group the collection of variables into who (e.g. name, age, physical condition, swimming ability and clothes), lifesaving equipment (e.g. use of life jackets), where (e.g. where they were last seen), when (e.g. when they were last seen), what (e.g. what happened to cause them to enter the water), how many and weather (e.g. sea state). For multiple people in the water, the information gathering is prioritised where required to understand how many people are in the water, if floatation devices have been deployed, has the location been identified and what is the on-scene weather, visibility, and water temperature. HMCG staff will also try to talk callers through the Float to Live advice, which guides people to control their breathing and float until help arrives. The US Coastguard is currently leading a project, working with other coastguard states, on a Probability of Survival Decision Aid (PSDA) on survivability in cold water. The aim is to gather sufficient data to establish whether a determination can be made to the IMO on whether the current IAMSAR guidance should be updated. Since 2022, HMCG has collaborated with the US Coastguard on this project and has shared all UK immersion data (such as age, sex, build, ability to swim, personal flotation devices are worn, time in the water) in support of this project. HMCG will continue to collaborate with this project and participate in any further activity related to the update of the IMO IAMSAR guidance.
Response document: Cranston Inquiry Report: Interim Response
Delivery
●Cabinet Office says completed · 5 Oct 2026
The Department for Transport published its interim response to the Cranston Inquiry in July 2026, which included updates against this recommendation. This update noted that many of the recommendations - including this one - have been marked as complete but are necessarily based on an on-going approach, rather than having a single end point. The Department (DfT), the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA), and His Majesty’s Coastguard (HMCG) are committed to on-going learning and improvement, and will regularly review processes and practices, learning from best practice, to ensure that they are fit to meet the evolving challenges of maritime search and rescue (SAR). Due to the operational and ongoing nature of these recommendations, the MCA has established an internal process of monitoring, verifying and reporting against recommendations that are its responsibility, noting that many recommendations require an on-going approach rather than reaching a single, fixed point.
From: Cranston Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, October 2026 (data file)
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.