P2-1

NHS trusts commission specialist security review

Fuller Inquiry · Fuller Inquiry Phase 2 Report · Issued 15 July 2025 · Addressed to: NHS England

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted in part (Dec 2025)

DeliveryDepartment of Health and Social Care says in progress (Jul 2026)NHS England says in progress (Jun 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

All NHS trusts with mortuaries and/or body stores should commission a specialist strategic review of the systems in place to protect deceased people, which should include a detailed risk assessment of the potential breaches of security that could occur. The review should include an assessment of: the systems in place to identify any unauthorised access to the facility; the strength and effectiveness of barriers to prevent unauthorised access to the facilities; the systems in place to identify any access to deceased people for unauthorised purposes; and how CCTV is used, including its monitoring and any audits undertaken.

Fuller Inquiry, Fuller Inquiry Phase 2 Report · 15 Jul 2025 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In July 2026, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State Preet Kaur Gill reported that NHS England had issued a national system letter setting out the actions expected of trusts to ensure improvements are delivered consistently (Preet Kaur Gill, Jul 2026). In June 2026, it had confirmed that new self-assessment questions reflecting inquiry recommendations were incorporated into the Premises Assurance Model, with submissions open until September 2026 (NHS England, Jun 2026). Earlier, in December 2025, the Department of Health and Social Care accepted the recommendation in principle subject to further work to determine its full impact (Department of Health and Social Care response, Dec 2025).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The record above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted in part · 16 Dec 2025

Words of: Department of Health and Social Care, Interim update on government progress in responding to the Fuller inquiry phase 2 report, 16 December 2025

The government has agreed to accept in principle 43 recommendations subject to further work to determine the full impact of these recommendations.

Extract from: Interim update on government progress in responding to the Fuller inquiry phase 2 report

Site note: This is the Department of Health and Social Care's interim update on government progress in responding to the phase 2 report, published on 16 December 2025. It sorts the 75 recommendations into those the government has accepted in full (11), accepted in principle (43) and is still considering (21), and gives words of its own only on the 11 accepted in full. Every word is the Department's, so the rows are filed under it, including where the passage reports what another body has done.

Site note: The recommendation is addressed to NHS England; the passage is the Department's account, not that body's. The update gives this sentence once, under its heading "Recommendations accepted in principle", and lists this recommendation there among the 43 it covers. It says nothing about this recommendation alone.

Delivery

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 15 Jul 2026

NHS England has also issued a national system letter setting out the actions expected of each NHS trust and providers to ensure improvements are delivered consistently.

From: Government update on Progress in responding to the Fuller Inquiry Phase 2 report, Preet Kaur Gill, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health Innovation and Safety

Site note: Written ministerial statement HCWS261, made on 15 July 2026 by the Department of Health and Social Care. It gives no per-recommendation breakdown, and it says the Government "remains committed to providing a full response to Sir Jonathan Michael's report once the leadership period for Prime Minister has concluded". That full response had not been published when these rows were recorded.

Site note: The source does not name this recommendation by number. It is recorded here because it addresses the actions expected of NHS trusts, which are the subject of recommendations 1 to 21. The source gives this passage once, for several recommendations. The same words are recorded on recommendations 1 to 21.

●NHS England says in progress · 26 Jun 2026

A new set of high-level self-assessment questions reflecting relevant recommendations made by the Fuller Inquiry has now been incorporated into the latest version of the PAM. The submission window for the NHS runs from 8 May 2026 to 8 September 2026.

From: Nottingham maternity review findings on post-death care and key actions required following the Fuller Inquiry

Site note: NHS England's national system letter to NHS trusts and integrated care boards of 26 June 2026 (PRN02500). Its Annex 2 maps the NHS-relevant Fuller recommendations to named supporting guidance by number. The letter instructs trusts and records what NHS England has changed; it does not report that any recommendation is delivered. Neither the Board Assurance Statement returns it asks trusts for by 31 July 2026 nor the Premises Assurance Model submissions that closed on 8 September 2026 are published. Where the row carries an Annex 2 entry, it is the whole entry: the recommendations it covers, where their text is, and the guidance NHS England maps them to. An entry that only names guidance states no delivery position, and the site marks it noted.

Site note: The source does not name this recommendation by number. It is recorded here because it addresses the NHS Premises Assurance Model, which Annex 2 names as the supporting guidance for recommendations 1 to 9.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.