Recording of routine observations
Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Healthcare providers
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The recording of routine observations on the ward should, where possible, be done automatically as they are taken, with results being immediately accessible to all staff electronically in a form enabling progress to be monitored and interpreted. If this cannot be done, there needs to be a system whereby ward leaders and named nurses are responsible for ensuring that the observations are carried out and recorded.
Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:
- The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) was published by the Royal College of Physicians in December 2017, updating the original NEWS (2012). A joint Patient Safety Alert from NHS Improvement, the RCP, and NHS England (April 2018) set a deadline for full adoption of NEWS2 across all acute and ambulance trusts by 31 March 2019. NEWS2 provides the standardised clinical scoring system for routine observations that automated systems are built to calculate (RCP, NEWS2, December 2017; NHS England Patient Safety Alert, April 2018).
- The government's 2022 Plan for Digital Health and Social Care set a target for 90% of NHS trusts to have electronic patient records (EPRs) by December 2023, and all trusts by March 2025. NHS England announced in November 2023 that 90% of trusts were using EPRs. However, only 25% were fully electronic; 71% used mixed paper and electronic systems. Nearly £2 billion in funding has been allocated to support EPR implementation (A Plan for Digital Health and Social Care, DHSC, June 2022).
- Electronic observations systems that automatically record vital signs at the bedside and calculate NEWS2 scores are increasingly adopted but not yet universal. Specific data on the proportion of trusts using electronic bedside observations as distinct from broader EPR is not centrally published.
- Francis's fallback recommendation — that ward leaders and named nurses should be responsible for ensuring observations are carried out and recorded — is addressed through the named nurse policies and CQC's assessment of observation recording practices under its safe key question.
Response — verbatim from government
●Department of Health and Social Care
The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf
Department of Health and Social Care · 19 Nov 2013 Written response →
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
- 6 Feb 2026 · NHS Digital / NHS England Francis recommended recording of routine observations (vital signs, fluid balance, nutrition). Electronic observation systems have been deployed in many trusts. The National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) is now standard. However, digital maturity varies significantly across trusts and paper-based recording persists in some settings. View source → Reasonable Progress
- 6 Feb 2023 · Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS. View source → Reasonable Progress
- 1 Apr 2016 · NMC - Nursing Revalidation NMC Revalidation launched 1 April 2016 in direct response to Francis Report. All nurses and midwives must revalidate every three years. Replaced the Post-Registration Education and Practice system. Updated NMC Code published March 2015 strengthened requirements around candour and raising concerns. View source → Confirmed Completed
- 1 Apr 2016 · Legislation - Health and Social Care Act 2012 (Monitor reformed) Monitor merged with the Trust Development Authority to form NHS Improvement from 1 April 2016. NHS Improvement then merged with NHS England from 1 July 2022 under Health and Care Act 2022. Francis recommended incremental merger of system regulatory functions between Monitor and CQC; this was partially achieved through structural reorganisation. View source → Confirmed Completed
- 31 Mar 2015 · NMC - Updated Professional Code (2015) NMC published updated Code of Professional Standards for nurses and midwives (March 2015). Standard 14 specifically requires nurses and midwives to be open and candid with all service users about all aspects of care, including when mistakes or harm have occurred. View source → Confirmed Completed
- 11 Feb 2015 · UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year. View source → Good Progress
- 19 Nov 2013 · UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2 Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted. View source → Good Progress
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.