F195

Nurse leadership

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Healthcare providers

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted in part (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England state no delivery position (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Ward nurse managers should operate in a supervisory capacity, and not be office-bound or expected to double up, except in emergencies as part of the nursing provision on the ward. They should know about the care plans relating to every patient on his or her ward. They should make themselves visible to patients and staff alike, and be available to discuss concerns with all, including relatives. Critically, they should work alongside staff as a role model and mentor, developing clinical competencies and leadership skills within the team. As a corollary, they would monitor performance and deliver training and/or feedback as appropriate, including a robust annual appraisal.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In commentary from September 2024, published in February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England reported that the Royal College of Nursing publishes workforce standards for nurse leads, guidance on supervision models is available, and Professional Nurse Advocates "are in the process of being rolled out" (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). Previously, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team noted in May 2024 that the government had accepted the recommendation in principle without mandating that ward nurse managers operate solely in a supervisory capacity (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The record above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted in part · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted in principle.
There needs to be local flexibility in delivering nursing care, so the Government are not mandating that ward nurse managers must operate solely in a supervisory capacity. However, in the initial Government response to The Inquiry, Patients First and Foremost, the Department of Health gave strong support to supervisory roles for Ward Managers (including Sister, Charge Nurse and Team Leader) in delivering oversight to all aspects of care on a ward and in a community, from cleanliness to allocation of staff. Nurse leadership and visibility at ward level provided by a Ward Manager is also important to the delivery of safe, high-quality care to patients.
Having sufficient nurses trained and with the capacity to ensure the delivery of safe, patient focused care is currently a core standard requirement of the Care Quality Commission. Nurse leadership is a core element of Compassion in Practice, the vision and strategy for nursing in England.
Key action areas include:
• using feedback to improve the reported experiences of patients;
• identifying strong patient experience measures that can be used between settings and sectors;
• a new leadership programme for ward managers, team leaders and nursing directors based on values and behaviours of the ‘6Cs’ of
Compassion in Practice;
• providers reviewing options for introducing ward managers, team leaders and nursing directors based on values and behaviours of the ‘6Cs’;
• providers reviewing supervisory status for ward managers and team leaders;
• strategies to secure meaningful staff engagement; and
• commissioners to ensure locally agreed targets to deliver high quality appraisals for their staff
Some Directors of Nursing are already achieving this or have plans and timetables in place to deliver it. Having supervisory leaders should be evaluated locally so that benefits can be demonstrated and shared.
The NHS Leadership Academy ‘offer’ includes leadership programmes for frontline staff – including nurses. We have already taken steps to improve staff performance and appraisal systems as set out in our response to recommendation 7.

Response document: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England state no delivery position · 27 Feb 2026

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) publishes Workforce Standards that set out the role of both Executive Nurses and Registered Nurse Leads and NHS Employers provides further guidance on clinical placement supervision models and clinical supervision models (for registered professionals).

For nursing, professional Nurse Advocates (PNA) are in the process of being rolled out. This is a clinical model of restorative supervision for nurses in England that equips PNA-trained staff to listen and understand the challenges fellow colleagues and teams are facing, and to provide and deliver quality improvement initiatives in response.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Superseded”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 195, PDF page 524.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

The Royal College of Nursing has commissioned the University of Warwick to undertake a review of supervisory status in two acute trusts. The report of this review is due shortly.

The project seeks to evaluate the change to supervisory ward sisters in two hospitals in the West Midlands. This change means the ward sister is now extra to establishment numbers and crucially has a supervisory role, being visible and accessible in the clinical area; working alongside the team; monitoring and providing feedback on standards and outcomes and creating a culture to enable person centred, safe and effective care .Data has been collected from individual ward sisters through the use of face-to-face interviews to explore how these changes have been perceived by the ward sisters themselves, what they hoped to achieve in moving into a supervisory role, and how they have evaluated whether the change has been successful in terms of patient care. In addition to collecting information from individual ward sisters the project team has interviewed senior nursing managers and the wider clinical team to explore their perceptions of the move to supervisory ward sister status.

The final report of the study will be disseminated through publications, networking and conferences.

NHS England is considering whether further work to assess the impact of supervisory nurses would be helpful to build on this study.

The Social Partnership Forum produced guidance on staff engagement and partnership working and highlights areas of excellence in NHS organisations where management and trade union representatives work together effectively to identify and resolve issues. The need for this guidance was indicated in Hard Truths and builds on the six key messages developed by the forum to support the development of the values, culture and working environment in the NHS that would best ensure that patients receive safe, effective and compassionate care.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

Site note: The Inquiry addressed this recommendation to healthcare providers, not to the Department of Health. The annex gives this update in the Department's publication and does not say who wrote it, so the row is the Department's report of the progress made on it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted in principle by the Government.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government said that there needed to be local flexibility in delivering nursing care, so it would not mandate that ward managers should only operate in a supervisory capacity. However, the Government stated its strong support for supervisory roles for ward managers.

In its February 2015 Culture Change report, the Government said that NHS England was considering whether further work was needed to assess the impact of supervisory nurses.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 195, PDF page 487.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.