F162 Accepted

Training and training establishments as a source of safety information

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: GMC

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The General Medical Council should in the course of its review of its standards and regulatory process ensure that the system of medical training and education maintains as its first priority the safety of patients. It should also ensure that providers of clinical placements are unable to take on students or trainees in areas which do not comply with fundamental patient safety and quality standards. Regulators and deaneries should exercise their own independent judgement as to whether such standards have been achieved and if at any stage concerns relating to patient safety are raised to the, must take appropriate action to ensure these concerns are properly addressed.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The GMC published "Promoting Excellence: Standards for Medical Education and Training" in 2015, following a comprehensive review of its education and training standards. The standards place patient safety as the overarching priority: Theme 1 states that "patient safety is the first priority" and requires that education and training providers ensure patient safety is not compromised by the delivery of medical education (GMC, Promoting Excellence, 2015).
- The GMC's quality assurance framework provides for the withdrawal of approval for training placements where fundamental patient safety and quality standards are not met. Where the GMC identifies that a training environment poses a risk to patient safety, it can require the removal of trainees from that environment, impose conditions on continued approval, or withdraw approval entirely (GMC quality assurance framework).
- CQC's fundamental standards (the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014) set minimum safety and quality requirements that all registered providers must meet, including those that host clinical placements for medical students and trainees. Providers that do not meet fundamental standards are subject to CQC enforcement action, and the GMC takes CQC findings into account when assessing the suitability of training environments (SI 2014/2936).
- The government's response in "Hard Truths" (Cm 8777, November 2013) stated that the GMC should ensure that providers of clinical placements are unable to take on students or trainees in areas that do not comply with fundamental patient safety and quality standards (Hard Truths, DHSC, November 2013).

Response — verbatim from government

Department of Health and Social Care

The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf

Department of Health and Social Care · 19 Nov 2013 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 15 Oct 2024 · DHSC - Penny Dash Review of CQC Penny Dash Review (commissioned May 2024) found significant failings at CQC. Health Secretary declared CQC "not fit for purpose". Key findings: one in five services never rated; inspection levels well below pre-pandemic levels; lack of specialist inspector expertise; 5,000 notification-of-concern backlog. CQC consulting on resetting its approach from October 2025. View source → limited_progress
  • 30 Jun 2024 · NHS England - Learn from Patient Safety Events Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service replaced the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS). NRLS fully decommissioned 30 June 2024. LFPSE has broader coverage including primary care, uses machine learning for analysis and improved trend identification. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 1 Oct 2023 · NHS England - Patient Safety Incident Response Framework Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) replaced the Serious Incident Framework from Autumn 2023. Shifts from individual blame to system-based learning approaches. Mandatory for all NHS-funded secondary care providers. Part of NHS Patient Safety Strategy (July 2019). View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 1 Oct 2023 · Legislation - Health Services Safety Investigations Body HSSIB formally launched 1 October 2023 as independent statutory body under Health and Care Act 2022. Replaced HSIB (non-statutory, established 2016). Has statutory "safe space" protections, powers of entry, inspection and seizure. Conducts system-focused patient safety investigations. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 6 Feb 2023 · Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS. View source → Reasonable Progress
  • 12 Sep 2022 · Legislation - Patient Safety Commissioner First Patient Safety Commissioner Dr Henrietta Hughes OBE appointed 12 September 2022 under Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021. Independent champion for patient safety regarding medicines and medical devices. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 11 Feb 2015 · UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year. View source → Good Progress
  • 7 Nov 2014 · Legislation - CQC Fundamental Standards New "Fundamental Standards" replaced previous CQC registration requirements from 7 November 2014. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 introduced clearer minimum standards including: person-centred care (Reg 9), dignity (Reg 10), safe care (Reg 12), staffing (Reg 18), good governance (Reg 17), fit and proper persons (Reg 5), duty of candour (Reg 20). View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 1 Oct 2014 · CQC - New Inspection Regime CQC overhauled its inspection regime in response to Francis. Professor Sir Mike Richards appointed as first Chief Inspector of Hospitals (July 2013). New methodology based on five key questions (Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led) rolled out nationally October 2014. Four-tier ratings introduced (Outstanding/Good/Requires Improvement/Inadequate). Specialist expert-led inspection teams replaced generalist compliance model. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 19 Nov 2013 · UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2 Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted. View source → Good Progress
  • 3 Dec 2012 · GMC - Medical Revalidation GMC medical revalidation launched December 2012. All licensed doctors must demonstrate fitness to practise every five years through appraisal and evidence. Francis Report endorsed and recommended strengthening revalidation. View source → Confirmed Completed

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.