F60

Consolidation of regulatory functions

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Department of Health and Social Care

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted in part (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say completed (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

The Secretary of State should consider transferring the functions of regulating governance of healthcare providers and the fitness of persons to be directors, governors or equivalent persons from Monitor to the Care Quality Commission.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry recommended transferring healthcare provider governance and director oversight to a single regulator. In commentary of September 2024, published in February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England stated that trusts must ensure directors meet fitness standards, with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) holding powers to enforce compliance against trusts (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). The department noted that the commission cannot disbar or directly regulate individual directors, observing that "the nature and scope of further implementation may need to be considered" (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team found in May 2024 that the fitness regulations did not apply to foundation trust governors and left direct enforcement to individual trusts (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 1 Oct 2026.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted in part · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted in principle.
However, we believe that the best way to achieve the desired outcome is through closer co- operation between Monitor and the Care Quality Commission rather than through the transfer of functions. The Care Quality Commission’s inspection regime will include a focus on whether or not an organisation is ‘well-led’.
We agree that the public have the right to expect that people in leading positions in NHS organisations are fit and proper persons; and that where it is demonstrated that a person is not fit and proper, they should not be able to occupy such a position. Monitor and the Care Quality Commission are committed to ensuring that, taken together, their processes for registration and licensing reflect these principles. The Care Quality Commission’s inspection regime will include a focus on whether or not an organisation is ‘well-led’.
In order to support this, the Government issued in July 2013 a consultation on Strengthening corporate accountability in health and social care. This proposes a new requirement that all Board Directors (or equivalents) of providers registered with the Care Quality Commission must meet a new fitness test. We are proposing that this test includes checks about whether the person is of good character including past employment history, and if the individual has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary for the work or office as well as the more traditional consideration of criminal and financial matters.
The Government proposes that the fit and proper persons test will now be used as a mechanism for introducing a scheme for barring Directors who are unfit from individual posts by Care Quality Commission at the point of registration. Where a Director is considered by Care Quality Commission to be unfit it could either refuse registration, in the case of a new provider, or require the removal of the Director on inspection, or following notification of a new appointment. Further details will be set out in the response to the consultation on corporate accountability which will be published shortly. We plan to publish the draft regulations for consultation at the same time.
See also recommendations 79 and 80.

Response document: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say completed · 27 Feb 2026

Regulation 5 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (2014 regulations) place a duty on trusts to ensure that their directors meet the fit and proper persons requirements set out in the 2014 regulation 5, as defined above, are compliant with the FPP. The regulations stipulate that trusts must not appoint or have in place an executive or a non-executive director unless they meet the fit and proper persons requirements in the 2014 regulations. While it is the trust’s duty to ensure that they do not appoint or have in place directors unless they meet the fit and proper persons requirements, CQC has the power to take enforcement action against the trust if it considers that the trust has not complied with regulation 5. This may come about if concerns are raised to CQC about an individual or during the annual well-led review of the appropriate procedures.

The above was implemented by the previous government. Though CQC was not given the power to disbar directors or to regulate individual directors, in light of this government’s commitment to bring managers into regulation the nature and scope of further implementation may need to be considered.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented – Closed.”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 60, PDF page 456.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

The NHS Trust Development Authority, Monitor and the Care Quality Commission published How Monitor, the Care Quality Commission and the NHS Trust Development Authority will work together to assess how well led organisations are in May 2014.

The Department of Health has consulted on a new registration requirement that all directors of providers registered with the Care Quality Commission must meet a fit and proper person test. The Care Quality Commission will be able to insist on the removal of directors that fail this test. The consultation included how the revised fit and proper person requirement will work, and questions about the impact of the new regulations. The consultation ran from 27 March to 25 April 2014. The Fit and Proper Persons Test Regulations have been passed by Parliament and are in place in November 2014 for NHS organisations and from April 2015 for other organisations.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted by the Government in principle.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government said that the desired outcome was best achieved through closer cooperation between Monitor and the Care Quality Commission rather than through transfer of functions. However, the Government stated the Care Quality’s inspection regime to include a focus on whether or not an organisation was well-led.

In the February 2015 Culture Change report, the Government referred to the introduction of fit and proper persons test which gave the Care Quality the power to take action against directors (reg.5 of the Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014). It does not apply to governors of a foundation trust.

The Care Quality Commission was not given the power to bar directors nor to directly regulate individual directors. The task of acting upon the Fit and Proper Person test was left to the individual trusts.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 60, PDF page 420.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.