F2

Putting the patient first

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: NHS

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

The NHS and all who work for it must adopt and demonstrate a shared culture in which the patient is the priority in everything done. This requires: A common set of core values and standards shared throughout the system; Leadership at all levels from ward to the top of the Department of Health, committed to and capable of involving all staff with those values and standards; A system which recognises and applies the values of transparency, honesty and candour; Freely available, useful, reliable and full information on attainment of the values and standards; A tool or methodology such as a cultural barometer to measure the cultural health of all parts of the system.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry asked the NHS to adopt a shared culture prioritising patient care. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England, in commentary of September 2024, published in February 2026, described action on shared core values, leadership development, and cultural measurement tools (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). Earlier, in May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team recorded that the government had accepted the recommendation and outlined past measures on leadership, inspection standards, and the statutory duty of candour (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 1 Oct 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation asks for cultural or behavioural change, which is difficult to verify from published sources alone. The record above reflects policy commitments rather than measured outcomes.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted.
Shared core values and standards:
• We will continue to use and promote the core values and expectations for the NHS set out in the NHS Constitution.
• The development of values based recruitment by Health Education England will reinforce the importance of values as the driving force of the NHS.
• The Care Quality Commission has conducted a major consultation on a new set of fundamental standards of care which will set out the inviolable principles of safe, effective and compassionate care that must underpin all care in the future.
• The introduction of a new and robust inspection regime is an important shift in the way nationally the system will ensure poor care is identified and tackled.
Leadership at all levels
• We recognise the importance of leadership at all levels in ensuring that we prevent terrible failures of care of the kind we saw at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, and welcome the connection made in this recommendation between effective leadership and the engagement of staff.
• The NHS Leadership Academy is developing and implementing a wide ranging programme of leadership support at all levels of the NHS, with a strong emphasis on values.
Information on the attainment of the values and standards
• We agree that the NHS needs to do much more to put in place a transparent approach to providing care and to working with patients. The shift to greater transparency is the foundation for the culture of honesty and candour that this recommendation calls for.
• We are putting in place legal changes that place a statutory duty of candour on healthcare providers and which create a new offence of providing false or misleading information.
We believe that the combination of positive reinforcement of the value of openness with sanctions for the most serious failings in candour and honesty will support the NHS to become a far more open culture than the one examined by the Inquiry’s report.
• We also agree that NHS organisations need to be accountable to the people they serve for the ways in which they have lived up to the values and standards expected of them. This will be in part achieved through the use of fundamental standards of care by the Chief Inspector of Hospitals.
Measuring cultural health
• We agree that it is important to ensure there is a clear understanding of the cultural health of different parts of the NHS. Regular inspection will provide the basis for a new, clear, transparent system of ratings that will be accessible to the public. All acute hospitals in England will have been inspected by the end of 2015.
• The Care Quality Commission is developing a set of indicators for inspecting all providers of NHS care, and this will permit judgements to be made about the culture of the organisation in question as well as other elements of its performance.
• In June 2013, the Care Quality Commission issued ‘A new start – Consultation on changes to the way the Care Quality Commission regulates, inspects and monitors care’. In this, the Care Quality Commission suggested that a ‘well-led’ service is one where there is effective leadership, governance (clinical and corporate) and clinical involvement at all levels of the organisation, and an open, fair and transparent culture that listens and learns from people’s views and experiences to make improvements. They confirmed their plan was to encompass an assessment of aspects of governance, leadership and culture as part of its inspections to assess whether a service is ‘well-led’.
• The boards of NHS organisations at all levels have a central responsibility to pay close attention to the culture of their organisation, actively dealing with cultural risks and seeking improvements in their organisation’s culture, drawing on support mechanisms such as the cultural barometer that is being developed by the National Nursing Research Unit at King’s College London along with other organisations. We would expect boards to be transparent about this with patients and the public.

Response document: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

The NHS Constitution provides that the NHS aspires to the highest standards of excellence and professionalism and to provide high quality care that is safe, effective and focused on patient experience.

The Constitution sets out the six core NHS values. These include a commitment to quality of care and working together for patients.

NHS values and standards are set at the highest level by the Department of Health and Social Care through the NHS Constitution and the Government’s Mandate to NHS England.

Leaders at all levels and across all organisations operating within the NHS are expected to model and embed these values. NHS England seeks to support and enable this nationally through training and development initiatives, as well as through its regional offices in the form of more localised support for providers. NHS England has a continuing focus on enhancing the offering for learning and development.

Other recent developments include the publication of the Directory of Board level learning and development opportunities which sits as part of the NHS England Fit and Proper Person Test Framework for board members. In addition, the NHS England Culture and Leadership programme provides tools to enable individual Trusts to understand and improve their culture.

The NHS staff survey and NHS People Pulse now provide a consistent and standardised framework to understand, measure and improve employee experience. Results are publicly available.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented - Ongoing”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 2, PDF page 424.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

The Department of Health has put in place a number of measures to address the elements of this recommendation. The detail of what the Department of Health have done is set out in the report on progress ‘Culture Change in the NHS - Applying the Lessons of the Francis Inquiry’ and in the updates we have provided on progress against other recommendations made by Sir Robert Francis QC.

Among those measures are:

Shared core values and standards

• The Department of Health is consulting on a number of measures in relation to the NHS Constitution in response to the recommendations made in the Inquiry report.
• Publication of a values-based recruitment framework to support recruiting for values.
• Fundamental standards of safety and quality incorporated into the requirements for providers registered with the Care Quality Commission.
• A new, robust inspection regime in place for hospitals, primary care and social care.

Leadership at all levels

• NHS Leadership Academy programmes launched to support leaders from ward to board to lead for safer, more compassionate care.
• Launch of the executive fast-track programme to increase the number of executive leaders in the NHS from clinical and non-NHS backgrounds.

Information on the attainment of the values and standards

• The Department of Health and NHS England have made available an unprecedented amount of data on safety and outcomes on the ‘myNHS’ website.
• The statutory duty of candour applies to NHS care now and will apply to all Care Quality Commission registered care from April 2015.
• New inspection model for hospitals now being used across the NHS.

Measuring cultural health

• New system of ratings in place, and the Care Quality Commission inspection model includes the assessment of how ‘well led’ an organisation is.
• The ‘myNHS’ website includes hospital-level data on the ‘friends and family’ test; whether an organisation is recommended by staff; and on open and honest reporting.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

Site note: The Inquiry addressed this recommendation to the NHS, not to the Department of Health. The annex gives this update in the Department's publication and does not say who wrote it, so the row is the Department's report of the progress made on it.

The tracker describes this as a long-term recommendation: systemic or cultural, with no single completion point.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted by the Government.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government said it would continue to promote the core values and expectations for the NHS set out in the NHS Constitution. The Government referred to the publication of a values-based recruitment framework; incorporation of fundamental standards of safety and quality into the requirements for providers registered with the Care Quality Commission; the launching of NHS Leadership Academy Programmes; launch of an executive fast-track programme; publication of safety and outcomes data on the ‘myNHS’ website; introduction of the statutory duty of candour; and the new inspection model adopted by the Care Quality Commission, including the assessment of how well-led an organisation is.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 2, PDF page 384.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.