Home / Inquiries / Leveson Inquiry / L23
← L22 L24 →
L23

Coverage of News Publishers

Leveson Inquiry · An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press · Issued 29 November 2012 · Addressed to: Press

Government responsePrime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street: Accepted in part (Nov 2012)

DeliveryNo statement from Press found

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

A new system of regulation should not be considered sufficiently effective if it does not cover all significant news publishers.

Leveson Inquiry, An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press · 29 Nov 2012 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry recommended that effective press regulation must cover all significant news publishers. In March 2018, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) relayed that the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) regulated over 95 per cent of national newspapers by circulation and did not intend to seek recognition under the Royal Charter, finding that few publishers had joined a recognised regulator (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, Mar 2018; Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, Mar 2018). Earlier, the Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press, granted by the Privy Council in October 2013, required the Recognition Panel to report annually if regulation does not cover all significant relevant publishers (Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press, Oct 2013). In November 2012, Prime Minister David Cameron accepted the Leveson principles, stating that the onus was on the press to implement them (David Cameron response, Nov 2012).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 1 Oct 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The record above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Report-level response context

PM David Cameron responded to all 92 recommendations with a single statement accepting them "in principle" or "in part". No per-recommendation response was published.

Government response

●Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street · Accepted in part · 29 Nov 2012

Words of: David Cameron, Prime Minister, statement to the House of Commons on the Leveson Inquiry report, 29 November 2012 (HC Deb vol 554 cols 446-448)

In volume IV of the report, Lord Justice Leveson sets out proposals for independent self-regulation organised by the media. He details the key “requirements” that an independent self-regulatory body should meet, including independence of appointments and funding, a standards code, an arbitration service, and a speedy complaint-handling mechanism. Crucially, it must have the power to demand up-front, prominent apologies and impose up to million-pound fines. These are the Leveson principles. They are the central recommendations of the report. If they can be put in place, we truly will have a regulatory system that delivers public confidence, justice for the victims, and a step change in the way the press is regulated in our country. I accept these principles, and I hope that the whole House will come in behind them. The onus should now be on the press to implement them—and implement them radically.

Response document: Leveson Inquiry (House of Commons statement)

Site note: The Prime Minister's statement to the House of Commons on 29 November 2012, the day the report was published, and his answers to members' questions on it (Official Report, HC Deb vol 554, from col 446). He speaks for the Government; the site files his words under the Prime Minister's Office.

Site note: The Prime Minister gives this passage once, for the report's proposals for independent self-regulation of the press as a whole ("the Leveson principles", col 448). The same words are recorded on recommendations 1 to 24 and 34 to 47.

Delivery

No statement on delivery from Press has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (2017 to 2023) · 1 Mar 2018

As so few publishers have joined a regulator recognised under the Royal Charter, commencement of section 40 could have a chilling effect on investigative journalism.

From: Government Response to the Consultation on the Leveson Inquiry and its Implementation: Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 and Part 2 of the Leveson Inquiry

●UK Government · 30 Oct 2013

10. The Board of the Recognition Panel must: a) prepare and publish a report of any review it conducts, whether of a cyclical or ad hoc nature; and b) inform Parliament, the Scottish Parliament, and the public as soon as practicable if, on the first anniversary of the date the Recognition Panel is first in a position to accept applications for recognition and thereafter annually if: i. there is no recognised regulator; or ii. in the opinion of the Recognition Panel, the system of regulation does not cover all significant relevant publishers.

From: Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press

Site note: The passage is the text of the Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press, granted on 30 October 2013. The Charter sets up the Recognition Panel and the criteria a press regulator must meet to be recognised. It does not report what any regulator or publisher has done.

Earlier findings (1)

●Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (2017 to 2023) · 1 Mar 2018

IPSO regulates over 95 per cent of national newspapers by circulation and does not intend to seek recognition under the Royal Charter.

From: Government Response to the Consultation on the Leveson Inquiry and its Implementation: Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 and Part 2 of the Leveson Inquiry

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.