Broader consent on Police Check Form
Bichard Inquiry · The Bichard Inquiry Report · Issued 22 June 2004 · Addressed to: Home Office
Government responseHome Office: Accepted (Dec 2004)
DeliveryHome Office says completed (May 2006)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The consents that applicants currently give on the 'Police Check Form' should be sufficiently broad to enable the requisite checks to be undertaken.
Bichard Inquiry, The Bichard Inquiry Report · 22 Jun 2004 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Home Office reported in May 2006 that Recommendation 28 had been implemented (Home Office, May 2006). The department had previously stated in December 2004 that it proposed incorporating the broader consent statement alongside changes for Recommendation 27, noting that legal advisers judged existing wording sufficient until relevant data-sharing agreements and legislation were approved (Home Office response, Dec 2004).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Report-level response context
Government response
●Home Office · Accepted · 22 Dec 2004
Initial consideration of the current consent statement requirements has been carried out, and it was proposed to incorporate this change within the change for Recommendation 27. However, until the data-sharing agreements with the various relevant data sources have been agreed and the legislation approved, the existing consent statement is judged by legal advisers to cover the current processes until the changes can be effected.
Response document: Bichard Inquiry Recommendations: Progress Report
Delivery
●Home Office says completed · 25 May 2006
We can report that Recommendations 24, 26, 27, 28 and 29 have been implemented.
From: Bichard Inquiry Recommendations: Third Progress Report
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.