Standards for police vetting checks
Bichard Inquiry · The Bichard Inquiry Report · Issued 22 June 2004 · Addressed to: HMICFRS, HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services
Government responseHome Office: Accepted (Dec 2004)
DeliveryHome Office says completed (May 2006)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
HMIC should develop, with ACPO and the CRB, the standards to be observed by police forces in carrying out vetting checks. These should cover the intelligence databases to be searched, the robustness of procedures, guidance, training, supervision and audit.
Bichard Inquiry, The Bichard Inquiry Report · 22 Jun 2004 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Home Office stated in May 2006 that the recommendation was completed (Home Office, May 2006). In December 2004, the department reported that the CRB, working in conjunction with the police service, had taken the lead in developing a QAF to provide detailed guidance and interactive tools to Disclosure Units, adding that the QAF was trialled and immediately implemented at Lancashire Constabulary due to its success, and further refined following a review by a practitioners group (Home Office response, Dec 2004).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Report-level response context
Government response
●Home Office · Accepted · 22 Dec 2004
Working in conjunction with the police service, the CRB has taken the lead in developing a QAF to provide detailed guidance, with supporting interactive tools, to Disclosure Units on how to carry out their role. The QAF was trialled at Lancashire Constabulary where, due to its success, it was immediately implemented and further refined following a review by a practitioners group.
Response document: Bichard Inquiry Recommendations: Progress Report
Delivery
●Home Office says completed · 25 May 2006
Recommendation 20 completed.
From: Bichard Inquiry Recommendations: Third Progress Report
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.