Registration scheme for working with children
Bichard Inquiry · The Bichard Inquiry Report · Issued 22 June 2004 · Addressed to: DfES
Government responseHome Office: Accepted (Dec 2004)
DeliveryDepartment for Education says not accepted (Feb 2011)Home Office says in progress (May 2007)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
New arrangements should be introduced requiring those who wish to work with children, or vulnerable adults, to be registered. This register – perhaps supported by a card or licence – would confirm that there is no known reason why an individual should not work with these client groups. The new register would be administered by a central body, which would take the decision, subject to published criteria, to approve or refuse registration on the basis of all the information made available to them by the police and other agencies. The responsibility for judging the relevance of police intelligence in deciding a person's suitability would lie with the central body. The police, as now, would be able to identify intelligence which on no account should be disclosed to the applicant. Employers should still decide, based on good selection procedures, whether or not the job required the postholder to be registered and should retain the ultimate decision as to whether or not to employ. The central body would have the discretion to ignore any conviction information judged not to be relevant to the position in question. Individuals should have a right to appeal against any refusal to place them on the register and that right should be exercised before any information is made available to a third party. The register should be continuously updated and available to prospective employers for checking online or by telephone. The register should be introduced in a phased way, over a period of years, to avoid the problems associated with the introduction of the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB). The DfES, in consultation with other government departments, should decide whether the registration scheme should be evidenced by a licence or card.
Bichard Inquiry, The Bichard Inquiry Report · 22 Jun 2004 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
In February 2011, HM Government stated in a review published by the Department for Education that "registration, and monitoring, will be scrapped" (HM Government, Feb 2011). The Home Office previously reported in May 2007 that the measure was being addressed through the planned Vetting and Barring Scheme under the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (Home Office, May 2007). The department had originally accepted the recommendation in December 2004, stating that it had found a practicable and affordable approach building on existing barring schemes (Home Office response, Dec 2004).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Report-level response context
Government response
●Home Office · Accepted · 22 Dec 2004
Recommendation 19 proposes the establishment of a register of all those working with children or vulnerable adults, whether paid or unpaid. We believe that we have now found a way forward on registration, building on and extending the scope of the existing barring schemes, that is both practicable and affordable.
Response document: Bichard Inquiry Recommendations: Progress Report
Delivery
●Department for Education says not accepted · 1 Feb 2011
Registration, and monitoring, will be scrapped. This means that there will no longer be an intrusive database containing the details of 9.3m people.
From: Vetting & Barring Scheme Remodelling Review: Report and Recommendations
●Home Office says in progress · 22 May 2007
The planned Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS), which will cover all those individuals working with children and vulnerable adults, addresses Recommendation 19 of the Bichard Inquiry. The legislative foundation for the new scheme is the recently enacted Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006.
From: Bichard Inquiry Recommendations: Fourth Progress Report
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.