43

Maintain focus on quality

Morecambe Bay Investigation · Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation · Issued 3 March 2015 · Addressed to: NHS England

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Jul 2015)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)DHSC states no delivery position (May 2024)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Mar 2020)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

We strongly endorse the emphasis placed on the quality of NHS services that began with the Darzi review, High Quality Care for All, and gathered importance with the response to the events at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust. Our findings confirm that this was necessary and must not be lost. We are concerned that the scale of recent NHS reconfiguration could result in new organisations and post-holders losing the focus on this priority. We recommend that the importance of putting quality first is re-emphasised and local arrangements reviewed to identify any need for personal or organisational development, including amongst clinical leadership in commissioning organisations. Action: NHS England, the Department of Health.

Morecambe Bay Investigation, Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation · 3 Mar 2015 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England reported that implementation remained ongoing, highlighting a portfolio of National Quality Board guidance and tools developed to support Integrated Care Systems, including transition guidance and an updated framework for System Quality Groups (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team found that the recommendation had been clearly implemented (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation asks for cultural or behavioural change, which is difficult to verify from published sources alone. The record above reflects policy commitments rather than measured outcomes.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 16 Jul 2015

Words of: Department of Health, Learning not blaming (Cm 9113), government response to the Morecambe Bay Investigation and two other reports, July 2015

111. We accept this recommendation, and strongly agree that the emphasis on quality of care must be maintained, and that service changes should put the safety and quality of patient care as central objectives. Indeed the recent NHS reforms to the structure and assessment of the health service, including GP-led commissioning and an expert-led inspection system have put clinical priorities and patient care at its heart. The Government will continue to prioritise the quality of care, and will hold its arms-length bodies to account on their commitments to reinforce and improve the quality of care. This will be a key focus of the newly re-established National Quality Board, in providing leadership for quality across the NHS.

Response document: Learning not blaming: The government response to the Freedom to Speak Up consultation, the Public Administration Select Committee report 'Investigating Clinical Incidents in the NHS', and the Morecambe Bay Investigation

Site note: This is the Department of Health's response, "Learning not blaming" (Cm 9113, July 2015), to the Morecambe Bay Investigation and two other reports. The department has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018, and the rows are filed under that name. Every word is the department's, including where it reports what another body has done or will do.

Site note: The recommendation is addressed to NHS England; the passage is the Department of Health's account, not that body's.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

The Thirlwall Inquiry has noted action taken in response to this recommendation. In April 2021, the National Quality Board (NQB) published a position statement on ‘Managing Risks and improving Quality through integrated Care Systems’. Alongside this, the NQB and NHS England developed a wide portfolio of quality guidance and tools to support ICSs as they develop. These include: • A refreshed shared commitment to quality (April 2021) to provide a common definition and vision of quality for those working in health and care systems. It uses the existing Darzi-based definition of high-quality care as being safe, effective, and providing a positive experience, with a greater emphasis on population health and health inequalities.

• Preparing for handover: Managing Quality Risks and Improving Quality through integrated Care Systems in ICSs (October 2021) which summarises the key responsibilities and considerations for ICSs relating to quality and to aid the operational transition from Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) to ICBs. It refreshes the 2012 NQB handover publication that supported quality in the transition from Primary Care Trusts (PCT) to CCGs.

• A refreshed framework for System Quality Groups. NQB Guidance on System Quality Groups (Dec 2021, working document – ICS Quality Hub – FutureNHS Collaboration Platform), which refreshes existing NQB guidance on ‘Quality Surveillance Groups’ and provides clarity on System Quality Groups and broader ICS quality governance structures in which key health and care partners come together to share intelligence and risk on quality of care.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented – Ongoing”. Table row: section 23.2 No. 43, PDF page 656-657.

●DHSC states no delivery position · 15 May 2024

In April 2021, the NQB published a position statement on Managing Risks and Improving Quality through Integrated Care Systems.

Alongside this the NQB and NHSEI have progressed a wide portfolio of quality guidance and tools to support ICSs as they develop. These include:

• A refreshed Shared Commitme nt to Quality (April 2021) to provide a common definition and vision of quality for those working in health and care systems. It uses the existing Darzi-based definition of high-quality care as being safe, effective, and providing a positive experience, with a greater emphasis on population health and health inequalities.

• Preparing for Handover: Managing Quality Risks and Improving Quality through Integrated Care Systems in ICSs (October 2021), which summarise s the key responsibilit ies and considerati ons for ICSs relating to quality and to aid the operational transition from CCGs to ICBs. It refreshes the 2012 NQB handover publication that supported quality in the transition from PCTs to CCGs.
• A refreshed framework for System Quality Groups (SQG) (B0894- nqb-guidance-on-system-quality-groups.pdf (england.nh s.uk) which refreshes existing NQB guidance on ‘Quality Surveillanc e Groups’ and provides clarity on SQGs and broader ICS quality governance structures in which key health and care partners come together to share intelligence and risk on quality of care.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024), The Department of Health and Social Care

Site note: DHSC's own comments on progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in February 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). They are not a finding of the Inquiry. Table row: section 20.2 No. 43, PDF page 622-627.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 2 Mar 2020

The Department is committed to ensure that services across the health and care system are of the highest quality through ongoing system regulation and oversight.

The Care Quality Commission is the independent regulator of quality for health and adult social care in England, it uses its powers to provides assurance and encourages improvement.

The new regional architecture has quality embedded into the role and responsibility of Clinical Quality Directors and other regional leads as well as through clinical networks and Local Maternity Systems.

The National Quality Board is reviewing the national model of quality surveillance, specifically the role of Quality Surveillance Groups in monitoring and managing quality issues within local health and care systems.

From: NHS: Standards (written question UIN 21206)

The tracker describes this as a long-term recommendation: systemic or cultural, with no single completion point.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

Department of Health (July 2015):

Accepts this recommendation.

“The Government will continue to prioritise the quality of care, and will hold its arms-length bodies to account on their commitments to reinforce and improve the quality of care. This will be a key focus of the newly re-established National Quality Board, in providing leadership for quality across the NHS.” (p. 96)

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review colours its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green, which it uses to mark evidence, identified by the legal team, that a recommendation has been clearly implemented. Table row: section 20.2 No. 43, PDF page 622-627.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.