Novel Policy Scrutiny
RHI Inquiry · The Report of the Independent Public Inquiry into the Non-Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme · Issued 13 March 2020 · Addressed to: Northern Ireland Executive
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
Novel, potentially volatile and untested initiatives should in future be scrutinised thoroughly, well ahead of ministerial and business case approval. The Inquiry commends processes such as a 'starting point Gateway assessment' and, at a suitable point, a 'feasibility signoff' completed by the Department's Accounting Officer. With regard to particular policies driven by unpredictable demand, consideration should always be given, before the policy is implemented, to the inclusion of a clearly drafted statutory power to enable swift action to be taken to suspend and/or close the scheme in order to bring it under control.
RHI Inquiry, The Report of the Independent Public Inquiry into the Non-Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme · 13 Mar 2020 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:
- The NIAO Second Progress Report (October 2024) assessed this recommendation as "Likely to be Implemented" overall, noting that sub-recommendation 2(1) on pre-approval scrutiny was assessed as Implemented via updated Gateway assessments, but sub-recommendation 2(2) on pilot or phased rollout for novel initiatives remained in progress (NIAO Second Progress Report, October 2024).
Response — verbatim from government
●Northern Ireland Executive
[Note: The NI Executive responded to recommendations 1-4 together as a group under the 'Policy Development' theme.] NI Executive Response (October 2021): These recommendations can be accepted in full. Some elements are addressed in existing guidance, including: the role of the Senior Responsible Officer in respect of the delivery of a project or programme; existing Business Case guidance; the obligation upon civil servants under their Code of Ethics to provide objective and impartial advice, and to give Ministers all the facts; departmental systems to set priorities and targets (consistent with the PfG) to report progress against key targets. They have been addressed in work to date through: the review of recruitment and selection policies and practices as part of the NICS People Strategy; the Review of Business Case and Expenditure Approval processes. Further work is required to: reflect key principles in the guidance relating to policy making, Business Cases, Project Management including Gateway guidance, and risk-management; address the knowledge and skills of those in policy roles, including training with an emphasis on modelling and testing, by conducting a fundamental review of the Practical Guide to Policy Making through the Policy Champions' Network, and follow through to the Policy Skills Guide and policy-skills training offer; embed NICS ethical standards; ensure financial and non-financial performance target reporting to the Minister, including outside the budget period.
Northern Ireland Executive · 7 Oct 2021 Written response →
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
- 15 Oct 2024 NIAO Second Progress Report (October 2024): Likely to be Implemented. Sub-recommendation 2(1) on pre-approval scrutiny is assessed as Implemented via updated Gateway assessments. Sub-recommendation 2(2) on demand-driven policy controls is assessed as 'likely' — the Making a Difference guidance covers risk mitigation but NIAO seeks evidence of rigorous application in practice. Source →
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.