MAI-54

School records on radicalisation vulnerability

Manchester Arena Inquiry · Manchester Arena Inquiry: Volume 3: Radicalisation and Preventability · Issued 2 March 2023 · Addressed to: Department for Education

Government responseUK Government: Accepted (Nov 2025)

DeliveryCabinet Office says in progress (Feb 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

I recommend that the Department for Education consider whether schools should include notes of any significant behavioural problems on the Common Transfer File, or some other suitable new form of record which follows a student if they move school. The focus should be on any behaviour that may be indicative of violent extremism, such as physical aggression or misogynistic conduct. This kind of behaviour is consistent with the development of a violent extremist mindset, but is not necessarily an indication of it by any means. Details as to what nature of incident and level of seriousness should be included in such a record will therefore require careful thought by the Department for Education, alongside consultation with relevant stakeholders.

Manchester Arena Inquiry, Manchester Arena Inquiry: Volume 3: Radicalisation and Preventability · 2 Mar 2023 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In February 2026, the Cabinet Office reported that the Department for Education's work on the recommendation remained in progress (Cabinet Office, Feb 2026). The department stated in February 2026 that it had analysed sector responses to a call for evidence on statutory safeguarding guidance to inform its proposed approach (Cabinet Office, Feb 2026). It noted in the same February 2026 update that it still needed to take a detailed submission to ministers and was awaiting broader government steers on the guidance (Cabinet Office, Feb 2026).

Sources

Cabinet Office, Feb 2026

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

Government response

●UK Government · Accepted · 14 Nov 2025

Speaker not recorded. Source: Cabinet Office, Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard (government response status), 14 November 2025

Accepted in full

Response document: Manchester Arena Inquiry recommendations (GOV.UK page linking to the Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard)

Delivery

●Cabinet Office says in progress · 27 Feb 2026

We utilised the existing call for evidence on the Keeping Children Safe in Education (KSCIE) statutory guidance to gather views from the sector to inform our response. We have these and have analysed the responses. We have had initial high level discussions with new Ministers but need to take a more detailed submission to them to discuss our proposed approach, which is likely to be carried out through KCSIE and through non-statutory guidance on safeguarding learners vulnerable to radicalisation. We are awaiting broader steers on the new government's approach to KCSIE to inform how we incorporate our MAI recommendations.

From: Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard

Earlier statements on delivery (0)

●Cabinet Office · 14 Nov 2025

We utilised the existing call for evidence on the Keeping Children Safe in Education (KSCIE) statutory guidance to gather views from the sector to inform our response. We have these and have analysed the responses. We have had initial high level discussions with new Ministers but need to take a more detailed submission to them to discuss our proposed approach, which is likely to be carried out through KCSIE and through non-statutory guidance on safeguarding learners vulnerable to radicalisation. We are awaiting broader steers on the new government's approach to KCSIE to inform how we incorporate our MAI recommendations.

From: Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, original version (data file)

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.