Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Stephen Ellis
Ref: 2014-0102
Date: 5 Mar 2014
Coroner: John Pollard
Area: Manchester (South)
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
A lack of warfarin home management kits for high-risk post-heart surgery patients leads to reliance on less efficient hospital monitoring.
Date
5 Mar 2014
56-day deadline
30 Apr 2014 est.
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
A lack of warfarin home management kits for high-risk post-heart surgery patients leads to reliance on less efficient hospital monitoring.
View full coroner's concerns
believe it would be good practice to supply warfarin home management kits to 'high risk' patients who have undergone heart surgery and are subsequently warfarinised: The cost of such kits would probably equate to, or be less than; the cost of hospital monitoring:
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 13th November 2013 commenced an investigation into the death of Stephen Ellis dob 23rd December 1953. The investigation concluded on the 4th March 2014 and the conclusion was Misadventure. The medical cause of death was Ia Haemopericardium 1b Recent aortic root graft and aortic valve replacement surgery and subsequent warfarinisation 1c Aortic stenosis and aortic root aneurysm 2 Ischaemic and hypertensive heart disease, long term haemo-dialysis due to previous nephrectomies for renal cell carcinoma. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH: The deceased was admitted to hospital for the necessary heart surgery and he was acknowledged to be a patient with significant co-morbidities_ After the surgery he was administered warfarin and thereafter there appears to have been some blood oozing from around the grafted area. When he was administered the warfarin whilst in hospital his INR levels were carefully monitored but upon his release from hospital these checks were reduced to 'weekly' and it is apparent that his INR was without this properly noted at the time. The consultant surgeon who performed the operation told me in evidence that warfarin home monitoring kits are readily available and widely used outside the UK: If Mr Ellis had had such a monitoring kit; he may have registered a higher than acceptable INR and this may have been picked up. if S0, it was the view of the surgeon, the outcome might have been different and he could have survived:
Action should be taken
rising being
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action. It is essential that full information is passed promptly to the GP practice of a patient being discharged.
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action. It is essential that full information is passed promptly to the GP practice of a patient being discharged.
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
COVID-19 Inquiry
IPC Structures and Transmission Risk
COVID-19 Inquiry
ICU Resource Allocation Framework
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Implementation monitoring group
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Public learning disability performance dashboard within 12 months
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Reverse burden for organisational failure to prevent harm
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Restraint and seclusion observation records
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Regular property and finance compliance checks
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
RQIA assurance of property processes
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
NED champion for restraint reduction
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Statistical process control charts
Report details
- Reference
- 2014-0102
- Date of report
- 5 March 2014
- Coroner
- John Pollard
- Coroner area
- Manchester (South)
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 30 Apr 2014 (estimated).
Sent to
- Department of Health and Social Care