Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Lalitaben Patel

Ref: 2014-0175 Date: 13 Apr 2014 Coroner: Catherine Mason Area: Leicester City & South Leicestershire Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

A locum consultant surgeon, despite being restricted to routine procedures, operated without additional supervision, raising concerns about oversight for consultants with identified limitations.

Date 13 Apr 2014
56-day deadline 8 Jun 2014 est.
Responses identified 1 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
A locum consultant surgeon, despite being restricted to routine procedures, operated without additional supervision, raising concerns about oversight for consultants with identified limitations.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) The surgeon who had responsibility for the elective cholecystectomy was a Locum Consultant Surgeon and was in the second week of his 4 weeks contract. Evidence was heard that he had been appointed via an agency following which he undertook two practical assessments at the University Hospitals Leicester. In summary, there were two main issues highlighted by both assessing Consultants on two separate days resulting in a decision to restrict the Locum Consultant Surgeon to conducting routine laparoscopic cholecystectomies. However, as this was a Consultant grade Locum, no other supervision was provided in respect of the cases under his clinical management.

Responses

1 respondent
Department of Health and Social Care Central Government
PDF
Action Planned

DHSC highlights recommendations from a 2013 working group to strengthen quality assurance of locum doctors, including strengthened GMC appraisal guidance, pre-employment standards, audit guides, and guidance for Trusts. DHSC continues to welcome progress against these recommendations. (AI summary)

View full response
From the Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP
• Secretary of State for Health Department of Health Richmond House 79 Whitehall London SIVIA 2NS

Mrs Catherine Mason HM Coroner for Leicester City and South Leicestershire The Town Hall Town Hall Square Leicester LEI 9BG J(1.J 1,,.,-, • f,/'-.t.J~A > Thank you for your letter about the death ofLalitaben Patel. Your report advised that, Mrs Patel died from post-operative problems following an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surge1y by a locum doctor at the Leicester Royal Infirmary. I am pleased to note that your concerns about the recruiting and management practices at the Trust have now been addressed. However, your report raised wider concerns about the practice for appointing locum doctors elsewhere. The issue of quality assurance of locum doctors working in secondary care is clearly important. In November 2013, a high level Secondaiy Care Locum Doctor Working Group ( established by the Health Minister ) made a series ofrecommendations to strengthen existing atTangements and these were welcomed by the Government. They include: " Strengthening General Medical Council appraisal guidance for doctors particularly the need to report on any locum work undertaken. " Strengthening guidance to responsible officers (ROs) to ensure they check with doctors that locum work has been recorded. " NHS Employers Pre-Employment Standards being strengthened to include a seventh standard - covering the need for an employer to be provided with information about an individual locum's RO, dates of revalidation, and appraisal; and that the employer should check an individual is not only fit for practice but purpose.

• NHS Employers publishing a standard audit guide for pre-employment locum checks, providing greater confidence in audits and checks.
• Strengthening guidance for Trusts, emphasising the desirability of using framework locum agencies, with a section included on best practice when using non-framework agencies.
• NHS Employers issuing guidance to Trusts suggesting the development of a set of core measurements on locum usage, which will give boards visibility oflocum usage and quality assurance processes.
• Providing guidance to T1usts on best practice with regards to quality assurance controls, which sets out minimum requirements. I continue to welcome progress against these recommendations. I hope that this infonnation has been helpful and I thank you for bringing the circumstances ofMrs Patel's death to my attention. JEREMYHUNT

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On the 21st December 2012 I commenced an investigation into the death of Lalitaben Jayantibhai Patel. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 11th March 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion which in summary recorded that inappropriate dissection during an elective cholecystectomy on the 4th May 2012 resulted in a series of complications which ultimately led to her death on the 20th December 2012 at the Leicester General Hospital.
Circumstances of the death
Mrs Patel underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Leicester Royal Infirmary on the 4th May 2012. During the initial stages of the procedure the surgeon undertook inappropriate dissection leading to a damaged vessel near to the common bile duct which subsequently ruptured resulting in a massive secondary haemorrhage. This in turn led to Mrs Patel suffering problems after her surgery, hypoxic brain injury and her death on the 20th December 2012 at the Leicester General Hospital.
Copies sent to
Chief Executive, University Hospitals Leicester

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2014-0175
Date of report
13 April 2014
Coroner
Catherine Mason
Coroner area
Leicester City & South Leicestershire

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 8 Jun 2014 (estimated).

Sent to

Department of Health and Social Care

Source links