Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Else Harvey-Samuel
Ref: 2014-0278
Date: 20 Jun 2014
Coroner: Peter Dean
Area: Suffolk
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
Doctors failed to provide adequate clinical information for imaging requests, and post-incident investigations lacked robustness to identify lessons learned effectively.
Date
20 Jun 2014
56-day deadline
15 Aug 2014 est.
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
Doctors failed to provide adequate clinical information for imaging requests, and post-incident investigations lacked robustness to identify lessons learned effectively.
View full coroner's concerns
_ (1) Doctors requesting radiographs or other imaging investigations (whether out of hours or not) must include sufficient clinical information to explain why the investigation is due very indicated to avoid the request rejected, and also to inform the radiologist who reports on the subsequent images what the relevant clinical history was (2) In the event of further need for justification of an out of hours investigation, discussion between senior clinician and senior radiologist should take place and be documented.
(3) In any post untoward incident investigation, the system for determining the correct level of post event analysis, and the investigation itself;, must be sufficiently robust to establish what occurred and to take any statements required as near to the time of the event as possible so as to identify any lessons that need to be learned.
(3) In any post untoward incident investigation, the system for determining the correct level of post event analysis, and the investigation itself;, must be sufficiently robust to establish what occurred and to take any statements required as near to the time of the event as possible so as to identify any lessons that need to be learned.
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On the 25th of February 2013 commenced an investigation into the death of Else Merete-Harvey Samuel, aged 89. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 21 of May 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was that Mrs Harvey-Samuels 'Died from complications following a fall and pelvic fracture, contributed to by significant pre-existing natural disease_ The cause of death was found to be Ia Bronchopneumonia, Bone marrow and fat embolism and anaemia to 1b Fall with pelvic fracture and haematoma, with contributory causes of Recent organising myocardial infarction and Coronary artery atherosclerosis There were matters that became evident which gave cause for concern:
Circumstances of the death
Mrs Harvey-Samuel was admitted to the West Suffolk Hospital on the 15th of February 2013 following a fall at her residential home which resulted in groin pain, and the possibility of a hip or pelvic fracture was considered by the GP who referred her to hospital. Radiographs at that time did not reveal any fractures. Mrs Harvey-Samuel's condition was complicated by other medical issues and pain control remained a problem. Repeat radiographs were requested out of hours because of continuing problems but the radiographer questioned the request and some views were not repeated, including the pelvis. The clinical history accompanying the request had not given the whole picture and the expected communication between senior clinician and radiologist; after the radiologist declined to do some views; did not occur. Following Mrs Harvey-Samuel's subsequent death a pelvic fracture was found at post mortem, along with significant natural disease. A clinical incident was raised and investigated following the X-ray problems but this did not answer all of the issues raised by the incident While it is accepted that there would have been no active management had the existence of the pelvic fracture been established in life, and the tragic outcome was still likely to have occurred, an accurate diagnosis would have assisted the clinical management greatly and, without attention to the issues raised by this sad situation, there remains a risk of other fatalities occurring if accompanying clinical histories are not complete and potentially significant radiographs are not taken as a result
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action.
Copies sent to
14 Dr Peter Dean 1k We~ being fully
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Medical record keeping
Southport Inquiry
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
COVID-19 Inquiry
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Full staff access to care plans
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Easy Read documents
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Clear records and disclosure policies
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Accessible financial records
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Six-monthly financial accounts to families
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Named person approval for transfers
Infected Blood Inquiry
HIV Eligibility Start Date
Report details
- Reference
- 2014-0278
- Date of report
- 20 June 2014
- Coroner
- Peter Dean
- Coroner area
- Suffolk
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 15 Aug 2014 (estimated).
Sent to
- West Suffolk Hospital