Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Peter White
Ref: 2014-0395
Date: 5 Sep 2014
Coroner: Tom Osborne
Area: Milton Keynes
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
Early Warning Observation Charts were incorrectly completed, triggers ignored, and observations unchecked by qualified staff, leading to missed opportunities for critical interventions. No audit system was in place for chart accuracy.
Date
5 Sep 2014
56-day deadline
31 Oct 2014 est.
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
Early Warning Observation Charts were incorrectly completed, triggers ignored, and observations unchecked by qualified staff, leading to missed opportunities for critical interventions. No audit system was in place for chart accuracy.
View full coroner's concerns
(1)Evidence was given to me that observation of patients are conducted throughout the Hospital using an Early Warning Observation Chart. The observations are often recorded by unqualified Health Care Assistants but the recordings should be checked and interpreted by a qualified nurse A trigger score is given for each set of observations; one trigger should result in a review by a senior nurse and an increase in the frequency of observations, two triggers requires a review by a doctor and three triggers a review by a specialist registrar. The chart is a tool to ensure that there is an escalation of care t0 an appropriate level: (2) In the case of Mr: White the EWS chart was not completed correctly, triggers were ignored and none of the observations were checked by a qualified member of staff_The evidence of Dr.
an independent expert was This resulted in lost opportunities to reassess Mr. White and in place the necessary resuscitative measures_ (3) was also told that there is no regular audit system in place to ensure that the charts are correctly completed, interpreted acted upon.
an independent expert was This resulted in lost opportunities to reassess Mr. White and in place the necessary resuscitative measures_ (3) was also told that there is no regular audit system in place to ensure that the charts are correctly completed, interpreted acted upon.
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 09/04/2013 commenced an investigation into the death of Peter John White aged 79 The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 05 September 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was a Narrative conclusion: Peter John White was involved in a Road Traffic Collision on 2nd April 2013 and suffered serious injuries_ He was taken by ambulance to Milton Keynes Hospital where the serious nature of his injuries were not recognised; there was a failure to adequately monitor his condition and a failure to escalate his care for a senior review resulting in a series of lost opportunities to render further medical attention and he died on 3rd April 2013 from Haemothorax The medical cause of death following a post mortem was 1 (a)Haemothorax !(b)Blunt Chest Injuries With Azygos Vein Laceration
2. Hypertension (with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Benign Nephrosclerosis)
2. Hypertension (with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Benign Nephrosclerosis)
Circumstances of the death
At 1653 02/04/13 the deceased was driving a blue Peugot 106, index towards the village of Little Horwood along Warren Road. Royal Mail delivery van, has turned left out of Bacon House Farm and into the path of the deceased: He was taken Milton Keynes Hospital where Xrays showed sternal fractures, rib fractures, right sided pleural effusion. He was taken to the surgical assessment unit overnight and became unwell the following morning and suffered collapse whilst undergoing a CT scan.
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you Chief Executive have the power t0 take such action:
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Restraint education effectiveness metrics
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Review supervision models for commissioned services
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
NED with clinical governance expertise
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Board member learning framework
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Risk-based inspection prediction
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Assess quality of first responder training
IICSA
National chaperone policy for healthcare (England)
IICSA
National chaperone policy for healthcare (Wales)
IICSA
Nottingham harmful sexual behaviour evaluation
IICSA
National LADO standards
Report details
- Reference
- 2014-0395
- Date of report
- 5 September 2014
- Coroner
- Tom Osborne
- Coroner area
- Milton Keynes
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 31 Oct 2014 (estimated).
Sent to
- Milton Keynes Hospital