Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Tanya Page
Ref: 2015-0038
Date: 2 Feb 2015
Coroner: ME Hassell
Area: London Inner (North)
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
Critical information about a patient's self-harm attempt was not shared between hospital wards due to staff reluctance driven by fear of perceived blame, hindering patient safety and learning.
Date
2 Feb 2015
56-day deadline
30 Mar 2015 est.
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
Critical information about a patient's self-harm attempt was not shared between hospital wards due to staff reluctance driven by fear of perceived blame, hindering patient safety and learning.
View full coroner's concerns
1. When Ms Page was transferred from Sapphire to Opal Ward, she disclosed that she had tried to hang herself whilst on Sapphire a few days before. Opal Ward staff members were shocked at this but, though they recorded the disclosure in the medical notes, they did not alert any staff member from Sapphire until after Ms Page’s death.
From the evidence given by the consultant psychiatrist on Opal Ward, there appeared to be a reluctance to draw attention to this information, because of the perception that it carried with it a criticism of the staff on Sapphire.
However, it was important that staff on Sapphire were told, both from the point of view of Ms Page herself, and because this was a valuable piece of learning for them that could affect how they cared for other patients. The worry about perceived blame should not have prevented prompt discussion.
There were other learning points discussed during the inquest, such as the necessity to search the laundry room as well as bedroom of a patient feared to be at risk of self harm; the potential for wardrobe doors to act as a ligature point and the desirability of sharing that learning nationally; and the training issues around use of alarms, ligatures, general patient safety and resuscitation techniques. However, evidence was given that steps have already been taken by the trust to act upon these and so I do not need to comment on them further.
From the evidence given by the consultant psychiatrist on Opal Ward, there appeared to be a reluctance to draw attention to this information, because of the perception that it carried with it a criticism of the staff on Sapphire.
However, it was important that staff on Sapphire were told, both from the point of view of Ms Page herself, and because this was a valuable piece of learning for them that could affect how they cared for other patients. The worry about perceived blame should not have prevented prompt discussion.
There were other learning points discussed during the inquest, such as the necessity to search the laundry room as well as bedroom of a patient feared to be at risk of self harm; the potential for wardrobe doors to act as a ligature point and the desirability of sharing that learning nationally; and the training issues around use of alarms, ligatures, general patient safety and resuscitation techniques. However, evidence was given that steps have already been taken by the trust to act upon these and so I do not need to comment on them further.
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 27 May 2014, I commenced an investigation into the death of Tanya Christine PAGE. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 29 January 2015.
The determination made by the jury at inquest was that, Tanya Page took her own life while suffering from psychotic depression on the background of emotionally unstable personality disorder.
The determination made by the jury at inquest was that, Tanya Page took her own life while suffering from psychotic depression on the background of emotionally unstable personality disorder.
Circumstances of the death
Tanya Page hanged herself whilst detained under a section of the Mental Health Act on Opal Ward of Highgate Mental Health Unit.
Copies sent to
Care Quality Commission for EnglandProfessor Dame Sally Davies, Chief Medical Officer for England, consultant psychiatrist, Opal Ward
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Standard form for derogations from guidance
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Documentation of technical adviser advice
Southport Inquiry
GMMH local structured risk assessment responsibility
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Debriefing policies for aggressive behaviour and restraint
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Independent review of systemic abuse conditions
Cranston Inquiry
Training on normalcy bias
Grenfell Tower Inquiry
London Fire Brigade to establish lessons learned process
Infected Blood Inquiry
Publish Guidance and Board Minutes
Brook House Inquiry
Ensure Home Office staff presence and visibility in IRCs
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Robust debrief systems for multi-agency exercises
Report details
- Reference
- 2015-0038
- Date of report
- 2 February 2015
- Coroner
- ME Hassell
- Coroner area
- London Inner (North)
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 30 Mar 2015 (estimated).
Sent to
- Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust