Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Shannon Gee
Ref: 2015-0039
Date: 3 Feb 2015
Coroner: Andrew Cox
Area: Cornwall
Responses identified: 0 / 2
View PDF
Delays in mental health treatment occurred due to unaddressed gaps between organisational treatment thresholds and difficulties transferring medical notes, raising concerns about seamless patient care.
Date
3 Feb 2015
56-day deadline
31 Mar 2015 est.
Responses identified
0 of 2
Coroner's concerns
Delays in mental health treatment occurred due to unaddressed gaps between organisational treatment thresholds and difficulties transferring medical notes, raising concerns about seamless patient care.
View full coroner's concerns
The situation now is improved from when encountered the delay in treatment to her but, on the evidence of a delay of ‘weeks’ in resolving clinical disputes as to which organisation should treat a patient is still worrying. Ideally, there should be a seamless union between the two organisations.
The fact that there is not appears to be a consequence of the maximum threshold for treatment by OSW being lower than the minimum threshold for acceptance on to the CMHT workload. Put another way, it is entirely conceivable that both OSW and CMHT may be correct in applying their respective rules as to whether a patient needs to be taken on where that patient’s presenting complaints falls between the two organisations’ rules. That may require formal guidance to resolve hence directing this letter to the Secretary in addition to the Commissioners. The difficulties set out concerning the transfer of medical notes and records appear more difficult to justify.
The fact that there is not appears to be a consequence of the maximum threshold for treatment by OSW being lower than the minimum threshold for acceptance on to the CMHT workload. Put another way, it is entirely conceivable that both OSW and CMHT may be correct in applying their respective rules as to whether a patient needs to be taken on where that patient’s presenting complaints falls between the two organisations’ rules. That may require formal guidance to resolve hence directing this letter to the Secretary in addition to the Commissioners. The difficulties set out concerning the transfer of medical notes and records appear more difficult to justify.
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 2 October 2012 I commenced an investigation into the death of Shannon Kimberley Gee aged 16 years. The investigation concluded at the end of a four day inquest on 29 January 2015. I made a determination that Shannon died as the result of an Accident.
Circumstances of the death
Shannon was recognised as a Child in Need. Intervention by Social Care had been considered but instead her case was referred to the Children and Adolescents Mental Health Team (CAMHT.) It was identified that a large part of Shannon’s difficulties related to the fact that both her parents suffered from mental health issues. For the purposes of this letter it is the position of Mrs Gee that is relevant. The inquest heard from currently the Acting Clinical Lead for OSW. A copy of her statement is enclosed and your attention is drawn to paragraph one on page two. Of note: ‐ Due to the non-receipt of notes and records that had been requested in other cases OSW no longer routinely requested such information from CMHT; ‐ There was a gap in the provision of mental health services in that (and others) were deemed too ill for OSW yet too well for CMHT. This resulted in a stand-off and the patient not being treated as a consequence. It is right to acknowledge that the two organisations have recognised the less than desirable state of affairs. At inquest I was told that since October 2014 a four-stage process has been put in place for determining any such clinical disputes with decision-making ultimately lying with the Kernow Clinical Commissioning Group. Another witness, (no relation) told me she had experience of patients who had been through the process which she said had taken ‘weeks’ to resolve.
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Southport Inquiry
GMMH and Alder Hey joint SMART audit
Southport Inquiry
Response officer access to case information technology
Southport Inquiry
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
GMMH local structured risk assessment responsibility
Southport Inquiry
National guidance on SMART action points
COVID-19 Inquiry
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Proportionate Access to Linked Healthcare Records
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Access to allied health professionals
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Whole-system commissioning with cross-agency risk assessment
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Full staff access to care plans
Report details
- Reference
- 2015-0039
- Date of report
- 3 February 2015
- Coroner
- Andrew Cox
- Coroner area
- Cornwall
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 2
2 responses not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 31 Mar 2015 (estimated).
Sent to
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Kernow Clinical Commissioning Group