Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Wanda Stachurska

Ref: 2015-0199 Date: 20 May 2015 Coroner: Bridget Dolan Area: West Sussex Responses identified: 1 / 2 View PDF

Mental health risk assessments were diminished by untrained interpreters and staff unaware of policies. Furthermore, a serious incident review was not undertaken, delaying learning opportunities.

Date 20 May 2015
56-day deadline 15 Jul 2015 est.
Responses identified 1 of 2
Suicide (from 2015)

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Mental health risk assessments were diminished by untrained interpreters and staff unaware of policies. Furthermore, a serious incident review was not undertaken, delaying learning opportunities.
View full coroner's concerns
In the circumstances it is my statutory to report to you: That the quality of the mental health risk assessment may be diminished iE: Mental health staff are not aware of relevant SASH policies when working at East Surrey Hospital; "to as policies policies guard security guard being using her patient using guard training from duty the use of untrained staff as interpreters for mental health assessments is the norm rather than anl exceptional or emergency occurrence; (c) staff members who are not health care professionals are asked to interpret mental health assessments; Staff members who are asked to interpret mental health assessments are not given any or guidance as to how to carry out this role
2) Neither SASH nor SABP had considered that should undertake a serious incident review into the case despite the death of a only a few hours after discharge. An opportunity to learn lessons from the above events has hence been delayed and potentially been To decline to conduct a serious incident review because of a pre-determined opinion that there had been not been any omissions or shortcomings by the organisation might reflect a misunderstanding by SASH of the purpose and value of such investigations_

Responses

1 respondent
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Trust NHS / Health Body
15 Jul 2015 PDF
Action Taken

The Trust has worked with East Surrey Hospital to ensure a shortcut to SASH policies is loaded onto Psychiatric Liaison staff computers, and has mandated that two staff members undertake assessments when a translator is required. An audit tool to review compliance with the translation policy will be embedded in supervision sessions. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mrs Dolan Inquest into the death of Wanda Stachurska REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Further to the conclusion of the inquest into Mrs Stachurska's death on 17 November 2014, you wrote to Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust in accordance with the Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, stating that during the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern: We would like to take this opportunity to offer our sincere condolences to Mrs Stachurska's family for their loss_ The areas of concern you raised that relate to our Trust and our responses are detailed below:
1.That the quality of the mental health risk assessment may be diminished if: (a) mental health staff are not aware of relevant SASH policies when working at East Surrey Hospital; (b) the use of untrained staff as interpreters for mental health assessments is the norm rather than an exceptional or emergency occurrence; (c) staff members who are not health care professionals are asked to interpret during mental health assessments are not given any training or guidance as to to carry out this role. 1a) We have worked with our colleagues at East Surrey Hospital to ensure that a shortcut to Surrey and Sussex Hospital (SASH) policies is loaded onto all of our Psychiatric Liaison staff's computers to ensure ease of access for our staff. The SASH policy relating to using translation services has been made available as mandatory reading for our staff working at SASH: 1b) As a local protocol_ we have now mandated that where possible two staff will undertake an assessment when the use of Translator is required, and full discussion between the staff will take place to discharge plan being how prior

Surrey and Borders Partnership NNHS] NHS Foundation Trust confirmed It is hoped that this will reduce any cultural misunderstanding and aid in better interpretation of the information: Ic) In SASHs procedures it is outlined that a member of staff can be used as the interpreter in an emergency situation. However when using a member of staff as an interpreter, Psychiatric Liaison Services will ensure that this member of staff must be healthcare professional and is aware of their accountability, responsibility and confidentiality duties. We have reminded our staff to ensure that record clearly in our electronic patient records any decisions made regarding the use of an interpreter and outline the rational for using staff for this role_ It has also been mandated that staff check that any use of an interpreting service is adhering to the East Surrey Hospital interpreter and translator policy and that record in the patient records their compliance to this policy for that interaction. 2_ Neither SASH nor SABP had considered that should undertake a serious incident review into the case despite the death of a patient only a few hours after discharge (a) An opportunity to learn lessons from the above events has hence been delayed and potentially been lost; We agree that an opportunity for prompt learning has been lost due to the delay in investigation: We however want to stress that we do take learning from such events seriously and as such we will be following up with the team concerned to ensure that the actions that have been agreed are embedded in practice, to prevent any future adverse events_ In this instance at the time of the incident coming to light, we believed that the lead provider in the care at the time of the death was going to report and lead the investigation process and as due process we would have taken part in the investigation. Unfortunately in this instance all the communication regarding the responsibility for the serious incident investigation was managed through the HM Coroner's Office instead of directly with our acute care provider colleagues as per our general practice_ We have taken steps to ensure that when such issues arise we as providers make contact with each other early and agree reporting and investigation responsibilities: Our Board and commissioners will be made aware of your letter and the actions we have taken to strengthen our processes going forward_ We hope that the steps we have taken as outlined above assure you and Mrs Stachurska's family that we have learnt and continue to learn from Mrs Stachurska's death_ Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further information:

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 25 November 2014 the Senior Coroner commenced an investigation into the death of Mrs Wanda Stachurska The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was suicide, the medical cause of death hanging:
Circumstances of the death
On 16 November 2014 Mrs Stachurska was brought by ambulance to the Emergency Department (ED) of East Hospital (managed by Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS 'Trust SASH') She had been found that by a member of the public taken an overdose of 30 sleeping tablets and was attempting to herself from bridge: She was also hypothermic immersing herself in the cold water of a brook: She informed the ambulance crew that she had been "trying to commit suicide Mrs Stachurska stayed overnight in the hospital and the following morning she expressed "suicidal intent= to the ED consultant At around 17.00 hours that afternoon she was assessed in the ED by mental health nurse and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation 'Trust (SABP) That nurse noted Mrs Stachurska now denied suicidal She considered that there was a risk of self harm and hence Mrs Stachurska was discharged home at around 19.00 The nurse did not ascertain that Mrs Stachurska had attempted to self-ligature at the bridge the previous although this information had been handed over orally by the ambulance staff to the ED nurse. The mental health nurse stated that had she known this information it would have been relevant to her risk assessment Mrs Stachurska was discovered deceased at around 09.00 the following torning, 18 November 2014, hanged herself from tree in not far from her home Mrs Stachurska was Polish and had limited command of English,_hence _her_ assessment Surrey May being Surrey having day hang from again from Surrey feelings. low hours. day, triage having park by the mental health nurse had to be facilitated through an interpreter: The nurse considered it was important to observe the patient's interaction and non-verbal cues through face-to-face interpreter The relevant SASH policy was only usC interpreters who are bilingually competent; neutral, independent and professionally trained and qualified" and that "the use of staff is not acceptable unless there are exceptional circumstances" (eg emergency situations). 'The mental health nurse stated that this was not an emergency situation: She also stated that she was not aware of the SASH policy although she was based at the East Surrey Hospital, where she understood SASH would apply, she was not required to be familiar with SASH because she was an employee of SABP_ The interpreter who was then provided to her by SASH was Polish man who was employed by a sub-contractor and worked as a security at the hospital: The nurse s experience was that the provision of a staff member as face-to-face interpreter was the norm rather than an exceptional occurrence: It appeared from the nurse's account that the provision of the as an interpreter WaS sub-optimal in that, although he endeavoured to assist; he did not alwvays directly translate but rather reported theme of what was said. Her view was that professional interpreter may have improved the quality of her assessment and allowed to gain more understanding of the nuances of what the was saying; Additionally, she stated that if an interpreter had been provided to her who was at least health care professional this would have been better; because that person would have had more understanding of terms and terminology and the reasons for the assessment: She had in the past completed mental health assessments members of clinical staff which she had found preferable: Furthermore, it was apparent that the security later discussed some information about the patient with another person: It should be noted that although he had been asked by SASH to act as a translator for Polish patients on several other occasions the man had not been given any or guidance by SASH in respect of how he should carry out this role and the nurse said that he had not been informed about clinical confidentiality in respect of this particular assessment: No serious incident report O review of this death has been conducted by either Trust involved. The mental health nurse had learned of the death her line manager who she considered was responsible for reporting the incident and could give no explanation why this grade 1' serious incident under the SABP policy had not been the subject of a SABP SI review. The ED consultant was of the opinion that a serious incident review was not required under the SASH policy because he believed there had been no omissions or shortcomings in the clinical care provided by SASH.
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and [ believe your organisations have the power t0 take such action:

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2015-0199
Date of report
20 May 2015
Coroner
Bridget Dolan
Coroner area
West Sussex

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 2
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 15 Jul 2015 (estimated).

Sent to

Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

Source links