Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Dorota Kijowska
Ref: 2016-0121
Date: 29 Mar 2016
Coroner: Caroline Beasley-Murray
Area: Essex
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
The outcome of a critical review meeting was not formally signed off by attendees nor clearly communicated to the patient, leading to a lack of clarity.
Date
29 Mar 2016
56-day deadline
24 May 2016 est.
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
The outcome of a critical review meeting was not formally signed off by attendees nor clearly communicated to the patient, leading to a lack of clarity.
View full coroner's concerns
The outcome of the review meeting was not signed off in writing by those in attendance (Consultant psychiatrist; middle doctor; review nurse) and clearly communicated to Dorota jury grade
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 15 March 2016, reopened the inquest touching upon the death of Dorota Agnieszka Kijowska: sat with a jury and on 17 March the jury recorded the following conclusions:- On 23 March 2015, at approximately 16.1Opm Dorota Agnieszka Kijowska was found hanging by a scarf from an unsecured loft hatch in a toilet cubicle at Gosfield ward the Lakes Colchester: Resuscitation attempts were unsuccessful and she was pronounced dead at 17.1Opm: Dorota Agnieszka Kijowska killed herself. Based on the evidence provided, the have concluded that there was a failure to provide a safe environment at the unit and this, in conjunction with ineffective communication, more than minimally contributed to her death.
Circumstances of the death
Please see jury's findings above: She had been an informal patient at the Lakes Mental Health Unit from 10 March 2015 and she returned from weekend leave at 8am on Monday 23 March 2015. At a review held that day, Dorota expressed threats to harm herself and the plan to give her a further period of home leave appears to have been changed: This was not relayed effectively to Dorota who was found hanging later in the afternoon:
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe your organisation have the power to take such action: Such important decisions must be agreed by all those present and signed off in writing so that there is no confusion as to the outcome of the review: Your RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 of the date of this report; namely by 23" 2016. 4, the coroner; may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken; setting out the timetable for action: Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
Copies sent to
Murray 29 March 2016 days May
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Southport Inquiry
GMMH local structured risk assessment responsibility
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Evaluation of Parental Involvement
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Parental Involvement in Training
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient Concern Organisation
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Lay representation on IPC committee
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Profile
Mid Staffs Inquiry
For joint action Profile
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Access for public and patient comments
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Using patient feedback
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Follow up of patients
Report details
- Reference
- 2016-0121
- Date of report
- 29 March 2016
- Coroner
- Caroline Beasley-Murray
- Coroner area
- Essex
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 24 May 2016 (estimated).
Sent to
- North Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation