Follow up of patients
Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Healthcare providers
Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 2013)
DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
A proactive system for following up patients shortly after discharge would not only be good "customer service", it would probably provide a wider range of responses and feedback on their care.
Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Inquiry recommended that healthcare providers proactively follow up with patients after discharge to gather feedback. In commentary of September 2024, published in February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England cited their August 2020 hospital discharge guidance, describing patient leaflets and staff action cards, but did not mention post-discharge follow-up for feedback (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team noted that the government had left trusts to decide how to follow up with patients while the Care Quality Commission assessed complaints during inspections (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 1 Oct 2026.
About this summary
Report-level response context
Government response
●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 19 Nov 2013
Accepted.
A good trust will take every opportunity to seek patient feedback. A good complaints system will recognise that some people will give fuller feedback once they have had time to reflect and therefore it is worth making arrangements to follow-up with patients once they have been discharged. Trusts will need to work out how they do this.
The Care Quality Commission will be assessing complaints as part of its inspection process.
Case study: Northumbria Healthcare – developing a meaningful patient experience programme
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust provides acute and community health services and adult social care to a population of over half a million people in the North East. The Trust runs nine hospitals (three general hospitals plus six community hospitals) and employs about 9000 staff. The level of engagement they now enjoy means that every day, somewhere in the organisation, somebody will be having a conversation about patient experience.
The Trust listens to the views of more than 30,000 patients every year through the following different survey methods:
• Patient Perspective surveys: To ensure ownership, results are reported at an individual consultant level, ward level, site and specialty and business unit level. Conducting these once people leave hospital allows them to give a more rounded view of their experience of care – evidence suggests that patients are likely to be at their most dissatisfied two weeks after discharge. In many ways this is ‘right time’ data which is less likely to be biased by the gratitude people feel towards hospital services and staff during the very acute phase.
• Real Time Surveys: Initially the Trust conducted face to face interviews with patients on 8 pilot wards across 2 sites. The real time programme has been rolled out incrementally allowing the Trust to improve in a sustainable way – they now interview over 500 patients a month across 7 sites and 35 wards. These results are fed back to clinical teams within 24 hours of capture, allowing the Trust to act rapidly on patient feedback while patients are still in our care.
• 2 Minutes of Your Time: This is a short quick exit survey which allows for a broad coverage across the Trust. Patients answer 6 key questions about the quality of care just before they leave hospital – this has included the Friends and Family question for the last 3 years. All data including all free text comments are fed back to clinical teams within a week.
Communicating results with the public: The Trust has developed innovative info graphics to ensure all the experience results are shared with patients, families and the public. Posters are updated each quarter so that the latest results are always on display.
Supporting staff to deliver patient-centred care: In designing the programme in 2010 the Trust deliberately aimed for a patient centred approach. What they hadn’t appreciated was the degree to which the real time programme would engage and support staff. In the annual NHS staff survey the Trust performs exceptionally well, with 94 per cent feeling their work makes a real difference.
Key learning from implementation has included the following:
• no single method has given the Trust all they need – they continue to rely on a combined approach;
• they’ve seen significant benefits of real time reporting;
• executive management team support has been crucial;
• ensure patients and families are part of the improvement team – this could be a ward based team or multidisciplinary team across a service;
• Patients have been involved in information development, teaching and training, service evaluation and mystery shopping;
• focusing on metrics that matter most has made sense;
• incremental roll out, change and improvement has given time for the programme to embed properly;
• keep expenditure on measurement to a minimum – invest in improving instead;
• qualitative feedback appears particularly important in engaging staff; and
• transparency of reporting matters.
Delivery
●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026
Please see response to recommendation 239 for information on the Hospital Discharge policy and operating model (2020). The Hospital Discharge Service policy and operating model (August 2020) service guidance includes patient information leaflets for a variety of different circumstances, as well as staff action cards summarising the responsibilities of health and care staff in the hospital discharge process.
●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015
Looking at whether patients can leave feedback easily has been a component of the new the Care Quality Commission inspections from October 2014 onwards. Complaints will be a key line of enquiry in the Care Quality Commission inspections from October 2014, and this includes looking at a random sample of closed complaints to see how they were investigated, and to look at how the Trust learnt from the complaint and embedded the change in the organisation. The Care Quality Commission will also be looking at the ward environment. Within the inspections, the Care Quality Commission will be able to look at whether the method of investigating the complaint was appropriate for the issue involved i.e. that in serious cases, independent investigation was conducted
What other bodies have found
●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024
This recommendation was accepted by the Government.
The Government stated it would for trusts to work out how to do this, with the Care Quality Commission assessing complaints as part of its inspection process.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.