Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Rosemarie Dees
Ref: 2016-0259
Date: 19 Jul 2016
Coroner: Henrietta Hills QC
Area: London Inner (South)
0 responses identified · 1 indexed addressee
View PDF
AI-generated concerns summaryThe coroner noted that an undetected foreign body airway obstruction could inhibit the use of a supraglottic airway (SGA). Requiring a laryngoscopy before SGA use could identify such obstructions, a practice expected to become protocol.
Date
19 Jul 2016
56-day deadline
14 Sep 2016
stated in the report
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
The coroner noted that an undetected foreign body airway obstruction could inhibit the use of a supraglottic airway (SGA). Requiring a laryngoscopy before SGA use could identify such obstructions, a practice expected to become protocol.
View full coroner's concerns
the use of an SGA may be inhibited by an undetected foreign body airway obstruction. Such an obstruction might be spotted if the use of an SGA was made conditional on the carrying out of a laryngoscopy which it is understood will soon be LAS protocol.
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
ROSEMARIE DEES, then aged 57 years, died on 18 April 2016. An investigation into her death was opened and an inquest held on 19 July 2016.
The inquest heard that Ms Dees had choked on a boiled sweet.
The medical cause of Ms Dees’ death was asphyxia caused by a food bolus in the larynx.
The conclusion of the inquest was one of accident.
The inquest heard that Ms Dees had choked on a boiled sweet.
The medical cause of Ms Dees’ death was asphyxia caused by a food bolus in the larynx.
The conclusion of the inquest was one of accident.
Circumstances of the death
The circumstances of the death are as follows: (1) Ms Dees had a range of pre-existing health conditions including COPD. There was evidence that this led to her often having a dry mouth/throat and coughing a lot. (2) Late in the evening of 18 April 2016 she was at home. Her son heard her banging loudly on the floor. He went to her and found her apparently choking on something. She lost consciousness. Her son began CPR and called the London Ambulance Service (“LAS”) who attended. The first LAS staff member arrived on scene at 00.03 am. (3) One of the LAS Paramedics used a Supra-Glottic Airway (“SGA”) (an I-Gel) to manage Ms Dees’ airway. (4) An Advanced Paramedic (“AP”) arrived and found that the SGA was ineffective, so she removed it. Upon removing the SGA the AP noticed a red, sticky, sweet-like substance stuck to the anterior aspect of it. (5) A further SGA was inserted followed by an Endo-Tracheal Tube using a video laryngoscope. (6) Advanced life support continued for 50 minutes. (7) Ms Dees’ life was pronounced extinct at 01.14 am.
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are that the use of an SGA may be inhibited by an undetected foreign body airway obstruction. Such an obstruction might be spotted if the use of an SGA was made conditional on the carrying out of a laryngoscopy which it is understood will soon be LAS protocol.
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are that the use of an SGA may be inhibited by an undetected foreign body airway obstruction. Such an obstruction might be spotted if the use of an SGA was made conditional on the carrying out of a laryngoscopy which it is understood will soon be LAS protocol.
Similar PFD reports
Report details
- Reference
- 2016-0259
- Date of report
- 19 July 2016
- Coroner
- Henrietta Hills QC
- Coroner area
- London Inner (South)
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 14 Sep 2016 (stated in the report).
Sent to
- Resuscitation Council (UK)