Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Ann Hardman

Ref: 2016-0350 Date: 10 Oct 2016 Coroner: Caroline Sumeray Area: Isle of Wight 1 response identified · 1 indexed addressee View PDF

AI-generated concerns summaryThe coroner noted that the current protocol for negative DVT scans at St Mary's Hospital relies on GP re-referral for follow-up, which risks patients not re-attending. An automatic re-attendance system, with GP discretion to cancel, would be preferable.

Date 10 Oct 2016
56-day deadline 21 Nov 2016 stated in the report
Responses identified 1 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The coroner noted that the current protocol for negative DVT scans at St Mary's Hospital relies on GP re-referral for follow-up, which risks patients not re-attending. An automatic re-attendance system, with GP discretion to cancel, would be preferable.
View full coroner's concerns
1. I am concerned that when there is a negative scan for a DVT at St Mary’s Hospital, the current protocol relies on the patient returning to their GP and being given another referral form for a further scan 6-8 days later. It was accepted that a better system would be one whereby the patient was automatically told to return for a further scan a week or so later by the ultrasound department, subject to the patient’s GP cancelling this scan, based on their clinical judgement of any review of the initial scan and/or any further examination of the patient. This would remove the chance of patients failing to be told to re-attend for a further scan.

Responses

1 respondent

Isle of Wight NHS Trust

NHS Trust
Indexed date: 21 Nov 2016 PDF
AI-classified response stance Action Taken
AI-generated response summary

• The Ultrasound department now automatically books a repeat scan for patients with a D-Dimer positive blood result and a negative initial ultrasound, to occur 6-8 days later. • If a patient does not attend the second scan, the Ultrasound Department contacts the relevant GP surgery to inform them of the non-attendance. • A joint letter was sent to all Island GPs to inform them of this new procedure.

View full response
Dear Mrs Sumeray Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths write to respond to your letter of 10 October 2016 following the inquest of Mrs Ann Hardman: understand thatl Consultant Radiologist attended the inquest with he had taken your recommendations further within the Trust: am therefore very pleased to report that we have implemented the following system in line with your suggestion: patient with a D-Dimer positive blood result but a negative Ultrasound scan now has a repeat scan booked by the Ultrasound department 6-8 days from the time of the negative scan: If a patient does not attend this second scan the Ultrasound Department will contact the relevant General Practitioners (GP) Surgery to inform them of this non- attendance. has informed me that he had written joint letter with General Practitioner to all Island GP's to inform them of this new procedure_ Thank you for highlighting this matter to me and am pleased that we are able to work with you to improve healthcare on the Isle of Wight:

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 23rd January 2015 I commenced an investigation into the death of Ann Hardman, aged 73. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 6th October 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was Natural Causes. The medical cause of death was found to be: 1a Pulmonary Thromboembolism 1b Thrombosis of the Deep Veins of the Left Calf 1c
Circumstances of the death
1) Ann Hardman presented at her GP’s practice on 13th January 2015 complaining of a three-week history of a painful left calf and cough. She was examined and found to have a swollen left calf, but her chest examination was normal. She was apyrexial and had oxygen saturation of 97% and a regular pulse of 70bpm. A D-Dimer test was undertaken which gave a positive result. Her Wells Score was 2 due to her left calf being swollen by more than 3cm than her right leg, and because there was pitting oedema on her left leg. Her GP gave her an injection of Clexane and sent her directly to St Mary’s Hospital for an ultrasound scan of her left leg to rule out a deep vein thrombosis.

2) Later that day at St Mary’s Hospital, she was scanned by an ultrasound sonographer who had difficulty carrying out the scan effectively as Mrs Hardman was a morbidly obese lady, resulting in a poor quality scan of her leg. The ultrasound sonographer reported back to her GP as follows: “Suboptimal scan due to technical limitations associated with the patient’s build. The common femoral vein, superficial femoral vein, popliteal vein and deep calf veins were assessed and no evidence was seen of an acute DVT on today’s scan.” Evidence heard at the Inquest from the sonographer revealed that the language that she had used was ambiguous inasmuch as the “technical limitations” referred to the difficulty carrying out an effective scan due to Mrs Hardman’s obesity, and that “no evidence was seen of an acute DVT” meant that a DVT couldn’t be seen, but due to Mrs Hardman’s obesity, it was impossible to be certain that there definitely was no DVT in her left leg.

3) Mrs Hardman had no further dealings with her GP’s practice before 20th January 2015.

4) On 20th January 2015, Mrs Hardman contacted her GP’s practice complaining of chest pain and requesting an appointment. The receptionist told her to dial 999 or offered to do it for her. Mrs Hardman declined this advice and shortly thereafter she was found dead at home by her daughter.

5) Evidence heard at the Inquest revealed that various protocols had changed since Mrs Hardman’s death, including that it is now the practice after a negative ultrasound scan for a DVT to rescan the patient 6-8 days later, and that this new practice had found 5 previously undiagnosed DVTs in patients who had previously been given a negative ultrasound scan thereby saving 5 lives, however this relies on the patient revisiting their GP and being given another referral form for a scan at St Mary’s Hospital.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: –

1. I am concerned that when there is a negative scan for a DVT at St Mary’s Hospital, the current protocol relies on the patient returning to their GP and being given another referral form for a further scan 6-8 days later. It was accepted that a better system would be one whereby the patient was automatically told to return for a further scan a week or so later by the ultrasound department, subject to the patient’s GP cancelling this scan, based on their clinical judgement of any review of the initial scan and/or any further examination of the patient. This would remove the chance of patients failing to be told to re-attend for a further scan.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Report details

Reference
2016-0350
Date of report
10 October 2016
Coroner
Caroline Sumeray
Coroner area
Isle of Wight

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 21 Nov 2016 (stated in the report).

Sent to

Isle of Wight NHS Trust

Source links