Ruth Perkins

(1) On admission to the Care Home, Mrs Perkin was assessed as follows:

Current Situation “Ruth mobilises with a Zimmer frame, supported by one staff member. She is at risk of falls MFRA tool for falls is in place”. Expected Outcome “To reduce the risk of falls for Ruth as much as possible” (2) I was informed at the inquest that her MFRA risk of falls score at the time of admission was 21.

(3) On 10 February 2018, only the day after her admission, Mrs Perkin was found by staff on the floor of the corridor outside her room having apparently slipped from the chair she had been sitting in. An incident form was completed and her risk of falling was reviewed resulting in an increased MFRA score of
29. (The highest level is apparently 35). On 11 February at around 08.30 pm during the evening, she was found on the floor again – this time in the lounge at the Care Home and it appeared that she had again fallen from a chair in which she had been sitting. The following morning, she complained of pain and was admitted to hospital where she was found to have suffered a right neck of femur and it was during that admission that she contracted pneumonia and sadly passed away.

(4) I was informed by the Care Home Manager that if Mrs Perkin not suffered a fracture and had been returned to the care of the Care Home after her second fall, she would have suggested to the hospital that, in view of Mrs Perkin’s tendency to act in disregard of care instructions, she was in fact most likely in need of 1:1 care.

(5) I was informed that for the 20 residents at the Care Home there are 5 staff on duty during the day, reducing to 3 staff at night, and my concern is that Mrs Perkin’s discharge to the Care Home under the D2A scheme, when her needs were still being assessed, actually placed her at an increased risk of falls and death as a result.