The Trust explains the care provided to Tillie Spencer-Adams on 4th May 2018, stating it was appropriate and in line with national guidance, and that there was no indication of injury to her forearm or head, and highlights existing clinical governance measures. (AI summary)
View full response
medical records The medical records specifically state that there was no facial bruising seen and no other bruising noted anywhere else on her body: Tillie's case was discussed with the Paediatric Consultant who advised that there was no requirement for a CT head scan as there was no external visible injury but to admit her for observation. In view of the presenting history, Tillie remained under hourly neurological observation and both the Police and the Trust made a social services referral. Tillie was reviewed by a Paediatric Consultant on the ward round the following morning; This review included a review of the presenting history and events overnight along with a detailed physical examination. The notes from that examination record that she was alert; active, good tone, handling well. The only injury noted is a linear red scratch mark on right mid- clavicular line. She was noted to be a 'well baby' . There was no indication from that review that there were any concerns about either her arm or a head injury At approximately 11am Tillie was transferred from the Children's Assessment Unit to Bluebell Ward The handover document records the only injury to be a red mark on her clavicle. Whilst the triage nurse in ED noted a red mark on Tillie's head, this was not observed by either of the Paediatric doctors who reviewed her_ nor any of the Paediatric nurses In addition; Tillie did not display any red-flag symptoms indicative of a head injury. Thus, in line with NICE Guidance, there was no indication to perform a CT head scan: Equally there were no external signs of any injury to her right forearm, nor did Tillie appear to be in any discomfort whilst in ED or the Paediatric unit. She did not require any analgesia and the medical records indicate that she was settled throughout the admission. Ihas discussed the case with the East of England (EoE) trauma network who agreed that in the absence of clinical concerns_ there were no requirements for this child to be subjected to further imaging or investigations_ For reference suggested referring to the EoE trauma network guidelines which are aligned with The Royal College of Radiologists guidelines for trauma in children. Please find Iinks below; http JlwW eoetraumanetworknhs uklclinicians/trauma-east-manual-of-procedures-and operations http IlwwW eoetraumanetwork nhs ukldocsldefault-sourceltrauma-east-manual-of procedures-and-operationsltempo-05 e-I-emergency-department-paediatric-major-trauma: imaging-decision-tooLpdizsfvrsn-2 Whilst recognise the contents of your regulation 28 report, hope the above explanation assures you that when Tillie attended the Trust on 4th May 2018 she was treated appropriately and in line with national guidance There was no indication to the clinicians at that time that Tillie had any injury to either her forearm or her head. We have stringent clinical governance measures in place to prevent such incidents from_ occurring: Our Paediatric team are committed to providing the best possible care for children and young people in our area and we continually strive to improve the services available_