Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Mildred Horrex

Ref: 2020-0126 Date: 8 Jun 2020 Coroner: Penelope Schofield Area: West Sussex Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

Poor record-keeping, including insufficient and inaccurate admission information, led to an inadequate fall risk assessment. Additionally, monthly drug audits failed to identify critical discrepancies between medication charts and actual stock.

Date 8 Jun 2020
56-day deadline 4 Aug 2020
Responses identified 1 of 1
Care Home Health related deaths Other related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Poor record-keeping, including insufficient and inaccurate admission information, led to an inadequate fall risk assessment. Additionally, monthly drug audits failed to identify critical discrepancies between medication charts and actual stock.
View full coroner's concerns
1. During the course of the Inquest it was clear that overall the record keeping in respect of Mildred was poor. There was insufficient information taken about Mildred by the home before her admission to Pelham House, the information that was taken was at times inaccurate and this lead to an inadequare fall risk assessment being insufficient.

2. Whilst the drugs chart showed that Mildred was taking her medication regularly the amount of medication that was found after her death showed that this could not be the case. We were told that monthly drugs audits were apparently carried out but they did not pick up the decrepancies in the recording on the drugs charts and the amount of medication held.

Responses

1 respondent
Pelham House Other
PDF
Action Taken

Pelham House has implemented several changes including family members signing pre-assessment forms, recording calls, implementing a new CQC-recognized care plan system, employing an external auditor for monthly audits, and ensuring all staff have access to updated policies and procedures. (AI summary)

View full response
Action Plan: Regulation 28 Report to prevent Future Deaths MH

Point 1 Matter of Concern During the course of the Inquest it was clear that overall the record keeping in respect of Mildred was poor. There was insufficient information taken about Mildred by the home before her admission to Pelham House, the information that was taken was at times inaccurate and this lead to an inadequate fall risk assessment being insufficient.

Response Prior to admission the family had a meeting with the manager of the home and the deputy manager, they themselves provided all the information to us everything they believed relevant, my deputy questioned them about falls history and they said mum is NOT a high risk of falling having only one fall whilst in her own home, all information was provided by themselves, the risk assessment was sufficient at the time it was extremely difficult to explain the workings of the system in a court room with individuals that have never used a care plan system before I believe this is why the coroner made the comment about record keeping, ( the paramedic in the court room understood perfectly well as he was familiar with the system) the system we used took the information provided by the family and generated a falls score, MH had not fallen in Pelham prior to her death and this meant that a falls referral would not be necessary, this is done after two falls or more and the information the family provided by the family did not warrant a referral, we are a Residential home not a nursing home and GPs do referrals or care homes. Point 2 Matter of Concern Whilst the drugs chart showed that Mildred was taking her medication regularly the amount of medication that was found after her death showed that this could not be the case. We were told that monthly drugs audits were apparently carried out but they did not pick up the discrepancies in the recording on the drugs charts and the amount of medication held. Response At the time of this incident visual medication spot checks were carried out by the Deputy Manager along with daily audits and monthly summaries. Assessing the competency of Senior staff administering medication is ongoing with a Senior member of staff that is a trained medical assessor and promotes in house training. Policies and procedures covering medication in the Home are well documented and accessible by all staff. Questionnaires on medication relating to the policies and procedures are used in the home as refresher tools for all care staff and all staff have training twice a year and an online course.

Pelham house response of actions taken. POINT 1 Pelham house restructured the whole pre-assessment process the paper work was updated and now reflects all aspects of an individual’s ADL as well as the existing questions ( this was already in place just with some more information areas

to highlight and family members are now signing the pre-assessment forms to agree to what has been documented) family members continue to sit with management and go through the individuals life and health history the family still continue to assist with the care planning with the individual present so we can get a good understanding of need, we also now have recorded calls something that would have been very beneficial at the time of MH arrival and passing, we also have a new care plan system that is recognised by CQC and this is working very well and has all information risk assessments and an audit trail, it allows a gateway should relatives with to log in and see what’s happening on a daily basis, Pelham house also employs an external auditor who comes to audit monthly and sooner where needed and is always available for advice all care plans and risk assessments are reviewed monthly and where needed if a change has occurred, and relatives have care plan reviews that are now signed, All staff have a log in to all policy & procedure on our external site there is a clear and concise falls procedure and all staff and new staff are required to read and act accordingly should a fall happen, ( this was also in place at the time of the fall ) we already work closely with the falls teams and occupational health.

POINT 2 medication Medication is audited monthly CCG / Kamsons pharmacy myself and the GP have worked together to ensure safe practices are ongoing, Home manager Audits internally alongside the deputy manager and there is a visible summery at the end of the audit to highlight any potential concerns. External auditor also audits medication and administration when he visits. There is ongoing support from the CCG and Kamsons pharmacy After a request from myself GPs now provide patient summaries for all residents that are currently in Pelham house and coming in to Pelham house.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 22nd January 2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mildred Horrex, aged 85 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 3rd October 2018. The conclusion of the inquest was that Mildred Horrex died an “Accidential death”.

At the conclusion of the Inquest indicated that I was minded to make a Regulation 28 report.

Regretably whilst the indication to make a Regulation 28 report was made in October 2018 it appears to have been missed and was not issued until June 2020 for which I apologise.
Circumstances of the death
On 30th December 2017 Mrs Horrex, who was left sleeping in a chair in her room at Pelham House, suffered an unwitnessed fall in which she suffered a fracture to her C1 and C2 vertebrae in her neck. She was taken to hospital but sadly did not recover from her injuries and she died on 18th January 2018.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2020-0126
Date of report
8 June 2020
Coroner
Penelope Schofield
Coroner area
West Sussex

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 4 Aug 2020.

Sent to

Pelham House, West Sussex

Source links