Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Ian Simpson

Ref: 2025-0226 Date: 12 May 2025 Coroner: Ian Potter Area: Inner North London Responses identified: 2 / 1 View PDF

The care home delayed calling an ambulance for an unresponsive resident and maintained inadequate, inaccurate records, including misleading and unlabelled retrospective entries, compromising patient safety.

Date 12 May 2025
56-day deadline 7 Jul 2025 est.
Responses identified 2 of 1
Care Home Health related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The care home delayed calling an ambulance for an unresponsive resident and maintained inadequate, inaccurate records, including misleading and unlabelled retrospective entries, compromising patient safety.
View full coroner's concerns
as follows:

1. Mr Simpson was found unresponsive by care home staff at about 09:30 on 16 December 2024, and an emergency ambulance was not called until 10:19. On the evidence in this particular case, that delay did not more than minimally contribute to death; however, it would or should have been obvious to staff that the resident was very unwell and required an ambulance as soon as possible.

This raises the concern that such a delay, if repeated, places others at serious risk. My concern was compounded by the evidence from the manager (which I did not wholly accept) that it would be reasonable to take this period of time for a nurse to be alerted, assess the resident, and decide whether an ambulance was required.

2. The notes from the care home were considered in great detail during the inquest, particularly the care notes from the morning of 16 December 2024. These raised significant concern about their adequacy and accuracy. While the deficiencies in record-keeping did not cause or contribute to death in the specific circumstances of this case, I am mindful of the importance of clear and accurate record-keeping to the delivery of safe and effective care more widely.

The issues included:
• an entry that was plainly not correct and therefore gave a misleading impression of interactions that staff had with Mr Simpson at or about the time of his being found unresponsive;
• an entry suggesting that Mr Simpson was ‘awake and lying in bed’, when he had already been found unresponsive some time earlier, suggesting that the entry was either retrospective (and not labelled as such) or simply incorrect;
• a series of notes, likely to have been retrospective but not labelled as such, giving a misleading impression of the course of events that morning.

While I was provided with some evidence that action had been taken in relation to this matter (such as an audit of records), I found that the evidence provided insufficient reassurance that the risk was sufficiently reduced.

Responses

2 respondents
Barchester Healthcare Other
7 Jul 2025 PDF
Action Taken

Barchester Healthcare completed themed supervisions with staff, supported by clinical leads, covering RESTORE2 and managing resident deterioration. They also provided staff with 'Clinical Shots' guidance and are reviewing the Appropriate Admission Policy, with a workshop planned for General Managers. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Sir,

Inquest touching the death of Mr. Ian George Stanton Simpson Magnolia Court (the ‘Home’)

I write further to the Inquest of Mr. Simpson and the Prevention of Future Death Report issued on 12th May 2025 and sent to Barchester Healthcare on 13th May
2025.

Barchester Healthcare has carefully considered the issues identified at the hearing and as detailed in the Findings and Conclusion ruling received on 30th April 2025. It was deemed necessary to investigate the circumstances surrounding Mr Simpson’s deterioration on 16th December 2025 and steps taken in response by the staff on duty further.

We set out the steps taken following the Inquest and the findings of our investigation below. We confirm we have updated the Care Quality Commission (‘CQC’) and will share a copy of this letter with them.

Findings

We have now spoken with all relevant staff working on the shift on 16th December 2024.

We confirm Barchester has found:

• it is highly likely the deterioration occurred after 09:45am on 16th December
2024.
• the entry made in Mr Simpson’s records at 09:46 in relation to repositioning is likely to have been made in error and most likely relates to another resident as this care intervention did not take place with Mr Simpson.
• it is not clear where the time of 09:30am as the time of the incident originates. Whilst this is recorded in the Accident and Incident Form, no member of staff suggested that there were any concerns at this time in respect of Mr Simpson’s health and wellbeing.

• Despite the evidence given, no other member of the Nursing team considered that 49 minutes is an appropriate length of time to escalate concerns to 999 if a resident is found unresponsive and staff did not recall there being any significant delay in doing so in Mr Simpson’s case.

Steps taken after the Inquest

Following the Inquest, we considered it necessary to ensure staff were clear as to the organisation’s expectations in relation to deteriorating residents. We acknowledged there was a need to improve staff understanding and use of EnabLE, the electronic record keeping. It was also apparent greater care was needed in the completion of Accident and Incident Forms which of course represent valuable sources of key information, if accurate. We have taken appropriate action in relation to staff members where departure from the organisation’s policy was identified on investigation.

New General Manager

We have appointed an experienced General Manager for the Home who has been leading on supporting the necessary improvements and staff development.

Introduction of EnabLE

EnabLE was introduced in December 2024. Our objectives were to standardise recording, increase visibility of day-to-day care interactions at management level, improve our ability to audit and conduct trend analysis of incidents and staff performance. We are confident the introduction of this digital care support planning system will allow the organisation to continually improve the standard of record keeping and delivery of prompt and effective care. Now our care staff, as distinct from nursing staff, have handheld devices and are expected to record narratives at the point of care which represents a completely new way of working for them having previously completed minimal resident records on paper.

Implementation of EnabLE represented a significant project for the organisation. Training and coaching were provided by an implementation team to our staff before, during and after introduction of the system. We are aware that there was a period in which staff were familiarising themselves with the use of the handheld devices and completion of prompts scheduled against resident care plans to ensure care interventions are in a timely manner, use of free text and drop-down options.

Following the Inquest, we have provided refresher training at the Home in relation to the functionality of the system, the organisation’s expectations and policy in relation to record keeping and the importance of accurate and contemporaneous recording.

We have the ability to review the documentation completed by staff at the Home remotely; the Regional Director and Regional Clinical Development Nurse continue to consider the quality of entries as part of the ongoing assurance audit programme. We are currently working on setting up a trial of an integrated digital accident and incident recording system, this will be linked to the digital care planning system to allow for the capture of key information relating to the incident in real time which will support our investigation of incidents in future.

Barchester Healthcare Policy in relation to Deteriorating Residents

We confirm the following steps have been taken at the Home to ensure that staff are clear as to our expectations in relation to residents who appear to be unwell:

•I presented learning from this matter to all our home managers during our ‘Leading the way’ internal communication webinar on 19th May 2025. This session covered responsibility to escalate any concerns in relation to residents’ health and welfare and utilise the guidance provided in our Deteriorating Resident’s Policy and that 999 must be immediately called for an unresponsive resident where this represents a new presentation.

•Themed supervisions have been completed with the support of Divisional Clinical Lead Nurse, the Clinical Development Nurse and both the Regional Director and General Manager of the Home. These themed supervisions cover two main areas:

•RESTORE2 – which includes ‘clinical judgement’ (RESTORE2 is a physical deterioration and escalation tool for care/nursing homes based on nationally recognized methodologies including early recognition (Soft Signs), the national early warning score (NEWS2).

•Managing Resident Deterioration.

The themed supervision programme was completed by the end of June and ongoing learning and development is planned for the Home.

•Staff in the Home have also been provided with Barchester ‘Clinical Shots’ guidance, to inform their assessment of residents and the steps to be taken in response.

As above, the Regional Director is monitoring the care provided at the Home to ensure the learning has been embedded. The Regional Director will continue to review resident incidents during their monthly visits to the Home.

We have taken the opportunity following our investigation to review the Appropriate Admission Policy to ensure that careful consideration is given to residents with more complex needs. At the Quality First Conference in September, which will be attended by all General Managers, I will be delivering a workshop on appropriate admissions which will encompass learning from a number of cases including this one.

We take all concerns raised extremely seriously and wish to reiterate that the health, safety and wellbeing of our residents is of paramount concern. We hope this explanation offers reassurance that the risks of recurrence of issues identified on investigation have been mitigated in so far as possible.

We offer our condolences to Mr Simpson’s family and friends for their loss.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Other
1 Sep 2025 PDF
Action Planned

NICE will amend its guideline NG89 to recommend VTE and bleeding risk assessment after a decision to admit to hospital, or after 12 hours in ED, or by the first consultant review, whichever is sooner. Recommendations on pharmacological VTE prophylaxis will also be amended to state it should be started as soon as possible and within 14 hours of the decision to admit, rather than within 14 hours of admission. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mrs Connor, We are writing following further consideration of the issues raised by the very sad death of Ms Ellen Mercer. Our thoughts continue to be with her family. We have reflected on the circumstances surrounding Ellen’s death and the concerns raised in your report, specifically that policies do not require assessment of VTE risk in people presenting at the emergency department. As we noted in our earlier response, we have published a guideline on venous thromboembolism in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism [NG89]. The guideline makes recommendations for VTE risk assessment for people admitted to hospital and we recommend assessing all medical patients to identify the risk of VTE and bleeding as soon as possible after admission to hospital or by the time of the first consultant review (recommendation 1.1.2). Since our previous response, NICE’s guideline surveillance team have thoroughly considered the issues raised in your report against our published recommendations and reviewed the issue you raise with topic experts. As a result of this, we will amend our recommendations in the guideline NG89 to say that people should be assessed to identify the risk of VTE and bleeding after a decision to admit to hospital, or after 12 hours in ED, or by the time of the first consultant review, whichever is sooner. Additionally, we will amend our recommendations on pharmacological VTE prophylaxis to state that this should be started as soon as possible and within 14 hours of the decision to admit the person (rather than within 14 hours of admission as at present) where VTE prophylaxis is indicated. We hope that these amendments will address the issue of VTE prophylaxis for people who have a prolonged wait in the emergency department. Thank you for bringing Ellen’s case to our attention and we hope that this further update is helpful.

2 of 2

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 24 December 2024, an investigation was commenced into the death of Ian George Stanton SIMPSON, aged 81 years at the time of his death on 16 December 2024.

The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest heard by me on 29 and 30 April 2025.

The conclusion of the inquest was ‘accident’.

The medical cause of death was:

1a urosepsis 1b long-term catheter following traumatic spinal injury (August 2024)
Circumstances of the death
Mr Ian Simpson fell in August 2024 sustaining a traumatic spinal injury as a result. He required a long-term catheter which increases the risk of urine infections.

Due to his complex care needs, Mr Simpson was admitted to Magnolia Court Care Home, Hampstead (Barchester Healthcare). At about 09:30 on 16 December 2024, Mr Simpson was found unresponsive by care staff and there was a delay in calling an ambulance. He was conveyed to the Royal Free Hospital and found to be suffering from sepsis, secondary to urine infection. Despite treatment, Mr Simpson continued to deteriorate, and he died in the hospital that evening.

The delay in calling an ambulance did not cause or more than minimally contribute to Mr Simpson’s death.
Copies sent to
Royal Free London NHS Foundation TrustIn addition, , for informationCare Quality Commission

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2025-0226
Date of report
12 May 2025
Coroner
Ian Potter
Coroner area
Inner North London

Responses identified

Responses identified 2 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 7 Jul 2025 (estimated).

Sent to

Barchester Healthcare

Source links