Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Angela Frost

Ref: 2021-0183 Date: 28 May 2021 Coroner: Catherine McKenna Area: Manchester North Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

The Trust lacks formal guidance for seeking second psychiatric opinions and consultants demonstrate poor understanding of confidentiality when communicating with family members regarding patient care and risk planning.

Date 28 May 2021
56-day deadline 23 Jul 2021 est.
Responses identified 1 of 1
Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths Mental Health related deaths Suicide (from 2015)

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The Trust lacks formal guidance for seeking second psychiatric opinions and consultants demonstrate poor understanding of confidentiality when communicating with family members regarding patient care and risk planning.
View full coroner's concerns
_ (1) There is no formal guidance or process in place at the Trust for Consultant Psychiatrists to seek a second opinion in relation to diagnosis, treatment plans or whether a patient meets the criteria for detention under the Mental Health evidence was that whilst there is nothing to prohibit a Consultant requesting a second opinion, it rarely happens in practice_ (2) There is no formal guidance or process in place at the Trust for health care professionals or family members to seek a second opinion in relation to the matters set out above.

(3) The court heard evidence that there is a lack of understanding on the part of in-patient Consultants as to rules around confidentiality and the naturelextent of permissible communication with family members ie: the difference between receiving information which might inform diagnosis, treatment and risk planning and discussions which involve sharing confidential health information.

Responses

1 respondent
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
21 Jul 2021 PDF
Action Planned

The Trust has drafted a process for requesting second opinions from consultant psychiatrists, healthcare professionals, patients, families, and carers which will be submitted to the Trust's Quality Group for scrutiny and sign-off and implemented across Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust's services. They are also working to improve adherence to the Triangle of Care standards, including surveys, workshops, and relaunching the program trust-wide. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms McKenna

I write in response to your Regulation 28 report dated 28th May 2021 and in respect of the concern you have highlighted after hearing evidence of the inquest of Ms Angela Frost.

Your concern has been reviewed and Pennine Care's response is outlined below.

Coroners Concern

(1) There is no formal guidance or process in place at the Trust for Consultant Psychiatrists to seek a second opinion in relation to diagnosis, treatment plans or whether a patient meets the criteria for detention under the Mental Health Act. The evidence was that while there is nothing to prohibit a Consultant requesting a second opinion, it rarely happens in practice.

(2) There is no formal guidance or process in place at the Trust for health care professionals or family members to seek a second opinion in relation to the matters set out above.

Since Ms Frost's untimely death, the Triumvirate Leadership Team for Oldham's Mental Health Services has reviewed the Trusts internal processes to request second opinions. Below is a summary of the work that has been done so far:

- A draft process for requesting second opinions has been written, and this will be submitted to the Trusts Quality Group for scrutiny and sign-off. The process includes guidance for how Consultant Psychiatrists, Health Care Professionals, patients, families and carers can request a second opinion.
- The process will be implemented across all of Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust's (PCFT's) services.

- The draft process is attached.

(3) The court heard evidence that there is a lack of understanding on the part of inpatient Consultants as to rules around confidentiality and the nature/extent of permissible communication with family members i.e.: the difference between receiving information which might inform diagnosis, treatment and risk planning and discussions which involve sharing confidential health information.

(Consultant Psychiatrist and Clinical Director) has reviewed the concerns related to Consultant Psychiatrists lack of understanding of rules pertaining to confidentiality and sharing information with family and carers.

Consultant Psychiatrists The serious incident investigation that was submitted to HM Coroner as evidence for the Inquest of Ms Frost identified individual performance issues with the Aspen Ward Consultant Psychiatrist involved in Ms Frosts care and treatment. The Consultant Psychiatrist is involved in an informal performance management programme.

All Consultant Psychiatrists employed by PCFT complete training, which covers issues related to information sharing. The training courses include:

- Mental Capacity Act
- Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards
- Safeguarding Children and Adults
- Section 12 and Approved Clinician Course (Mental Health Act, 1983)

Consultant Psychiatrists also access annual appraisals and can access case-based discussions with senior consultants, both of which are supportive mechanisms that support clinical practice. Triangle of Care PCFT is also a member of the Triangle of Care initiative. The 'Triangle of Care' is a working collaboration, or "therapeutic alliance" between the service user, professional and carer that promotes safety, supports recovery and sustains well- being.

PCFT first introduced our Trust-wide Triangle of Care steering group in 2014, followed by the establishment of each borough's local steering group to build on our success. This included Oldham. Before the Covid-19 pandemic, our momentum slowed as some of the local steering groups Chairs were lost, and carer champions moved posts. Covid-19 compounded these difficulties as a result of the pressures placed on services. Our Trust-wide steering group has re-commenced following it being stood down due to Covid-19.

To regain our momentum with Triangle of Care, we are currently:

- Undertaking a survey of inpatient and community service managers about the extent to which services are currently able to meet standards, seek examples

of good practice and understand any barriers that there may be implementing. This includes our services in Oldham.

- Collating a survey of carers undertaken where we sought examples of how it feels when we achieve each of the six key standards and when we do not. This will supplement the survey sent to inpatient and community service managers to provide a lived-experience context to the exercise. We will also consider how else this could usefully be used, for example, in training.

- We are working with our Network Directors of Quality to identify Chairs and local approaches to steering groups; again, this includes Oldham.

As we complete the work outlined above, we will move forward by:

- Holding a co-design workshop with the identified local lead/Chairs and carers to establish the framework/agenda that local forums will work to and decide the areas that should be prioritised. The outcome of our survey across our services will be used to inform this piece of work.

- Arranging a co-designed re-launch of the Triangle of Care, Trust-wide and in each borough, to reinvigorate our work and to promote it and build engagement internally and externally.

- Complete our annual report to ensure that we retain our first star and co- design a plan to move towards our second.

- Continue national conversations and if there is a continued absence of regional or national groups, seek to establish a group with other Trusts to promote inter-organisational learning.

In January 2021, PCFT appointed to the new role of Head of Patient and Carer Experience and Engagement. continues to work with services across the Trust to develop further and embed the principles of Triangle of Care in mental health services.

I trust this response assures you that the Trust has taken your concern seriously and has thoroughly reviewed the issues raised.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 28 August 2020 | commenced an investigation into the death of Angela Marie FROST . The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 21 May 2021. The medical cause of death was (1a) Amitriptyline Overdose. conclusion of the inquest was 'suicide whilst the balance of her mind was disturbed.
Circumstances of the death
The Deceased was admitted to Aspen Ward, Royal Oldham Hospital on 8 June 2020 following a mixed overdose. She complained of sensations which included feeling that her insides 'melting;' that she had 'hot lava' and snakes in her stomach' and a brain haemorrhage causing trickling in her head Hormonal tests undertaken during the admission established that the Deceased was post-menopausal. The Consultant Psychiatrist with responsibility for the Deceased was of the opinion that the sensations where related to the menopause rather than a psychosis. A GP trainee spoke to a Gynaecology Registrar who advised that HRT was contraindicated and recommended the use of herbal alternatives, The Deceased declined t0 take the herbal alternative and was discharged from the ward on 2 July 2020 on anti-psychotic medication_ Consultant Psychiatrist recommendation that a referral be made by primary care to Gynaecology to discuss HRT alternatives was not communicated to the Deceased's GP_ On 21 July 2020, the Deceased was re-admitted to Aspen Ward after being located in woodland. She had been missing for days with the express intention that she starve herself to death: During her second admission, her anti-psychotic medication was increased: The Consultant Psychiatrist formulated diagnosis of 'profound menopause with secondary kinaesthetic hallucinatory experiences_ These diagnosis does not feature in ICD-10 and a second opinion was not requested or obtained by the Consultant Psychiatrist: No contact was made with the Specialist Pharmacist attached to the locality to establish whether HRT was contraindicated and no further contact was made with the Gynaecology team. Had enquiries been made with the pharmacy team, it is more likely than not that it would have established that HRT was not absolutely contraindicated and therefore would have been a potential treatment option: Deceased's family members were not involved in discussions around all available treatment options and despite leaving messages for the Consultant Psychiatrist to contact them, sufficient enquiries were not made as to whether the Deceased consented to their involvement in her care. It is more likely than not that had sufficient enquiries been made, the Deceased would have consented to sharing information with her family which would have provided her with a source of support in her decision-making The Deceased took her own discharge from the ward on August 2020. A table-top review meeting was held on the same in which the Early Intervention Team were updated on the Deceased's condition. The Deceased was last seen by a mental health professional on 20 August 2020 during which she described an improvement in her symptoms She was found deceased at her home address on 24 August 2020 having taken an intentional overdose of her partner's old medication: The The The day
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action,
Copies sent to
have also sent a copy to the Care Quality Commission

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2021-0183
Date of report
28 May 2021
Coroner
Catherine McKenna
Coroner area
Manchester North

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 23 Jul 2021 (estimated).

Sent to

Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust

Source links