Serena Nicolle

The Coroner’s concerns are as follows:

At the conclusion of the inquest the court found that: i) Mrs Nicolle was last known to be alive at 12:40 on 3 September 2018; ii) At an unknown time between 12:40 and 16:11 she suffered a cardiac arrest whilst she was in her cell; iii) At 16:11 a prison custody officer observed Serena Nicolle through the cell hatch at which time she was lying unresponsive on the floor. The prison custody officer then returned to the cell at approximately 16:30 with a prison nurse. iv) At 16:30 the prison nurse looked in at Serena Nicolle through the hatch in her cell door and incorrectly believed that she could see movement in her abdomen and chest and therefore erroneously assessed that she was breathing, when in fact she was already deceased. v) Shortly thereafter a prison custody officer also looked in at Serena Nicolle through the hatch in her cell door and also incorrectly believed that she could see movement in Mrs Nicolle’s abdomen and chest and erroneously assessed that she was breathing, when in fact she was already deceased. vi) At 16:35 the cell door was opened and CPR was commenced initially by prison staff and subsequently by the attending paramedics. However, the resuscitation attempts were unsuccessful and Mrs Nicolle was declared deceased at the scene.

During the course of the inquest the court heard evidence that observing the movement of an individual’s chest and abdomen through a cell hatch is a standard procedure for checking whether they are breathing, in circumstances where they are not otherwise moving or responding to prison staff. The court heard that this is the position across the prison estate and is not limited to HMP Bronzefield.

The court also heard evidence from expert witness Dr , a Consultant Cardiologist, who stated that in his opinion it is very difficult to assess whether somebody is breathing or not by looking for movement in the chest/abdomen from a distance. The Coroner is concerned that on 3 September 2018 two members of prison staff assessed that Mrs Nicolle was breathing when she was in fact deceased, and that in doing so they followed standard procedures which are in place across the prison estate.

Whilst these errors did not contribute to Mrs Nicolle’s death, the Coroner is concerned that were similar errors to occur in the future, it would present a risk of future deaths, particularly given Dr evidence that it is difficult to assess whether somebody is breathing or not by looking for movement in the chest/abdomen from a distance.

The MATTER OF CONCERN is:

1. The observation of an individual’s chest/abdomen through a cell door hatch may be an unreliable method of checking whether they are breathing, in circumstances in which they are not otherwise moving or responding to prison staff, and therefore gives rise to the risk of future deaths.
2. Consideration should be therefore be given as to whether additional policies, procedures, guidance or training ought to be introduced across the prison estate to address this risk.