Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Malcolm Morris

Ref: 2025-0239 Date: 21 May 2025 Coroner: John Thompson Area: Northumberland Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

Incompatible electronic systems prevent efficient patient referrals from regional hospitals to out-of-area district nursing, leading to delayed or absent post-discharge care, risking patient deterioration and readmission.

Date 21 May 2025
56-day deadline 16 Jul 2025 est.
Responses identified 1 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Incompatible electronic systems prevent efficient patient referrals from regional hospitals to out-of-area district nursing, leading to delayed or absent post-discharge care, risking patient deterioration and readmission.
View full coroner's concerns
_ Mr Morris required various periods of hospital admission in Sunderland for elective and also urgent surgery: This was in part to address his cancer and also to treat recurrent wound infections arising from his surgery_ Sunderland Royal Hospital is a regional centre for the cancer Mr Morris suffered with. He resided in Northumberland which is outside the usual catchment area for the hospital trust Upon discharge from hospital in Sunderland, staff were unable to refer him electronically to district nursing services in Northumberland: They had to resort to telephoning the service to make a referral and were unable by this route to pass the necessary information to the service_ As a consequence, Mr Morris left hospital requiring catheter care and wound management. He did not initially receive district nursing support. His wound became infected and required readmission to hospital. His catheter bag became full and nor his family had any guidance on what action to take Evidence heard at inquest described that hospital systems were unable to communicate with healthcare systems outside of the immediate geographical area and as such efficient referrals to district nursing services were not possible_ May he,

This meant detailed information on Mr Morris's discharge arrangements and ongoing treatment could not be passed and ultimately district nurses relied on inadequate brief paper-based discharge documents_ In Mr Morris's case he was supported and cared for by his wife and family: They sought advice and made contact with the district nursing services themselves to affect a referral, after the absence of nursing support following his first discharge from hospital. My concern is, had Mr Morris been discharged without any support from his family, lived alone or been vulnerable in some way, he may have not been able to access nursing services_ Even with family support, his wound became infected and required readmission to hospital: My concern is other persons may be at risk of death if discharging hospitals cannot efficiently, comprehensively and in a timely fashion refer patients to ongoing care in the community. The evidence have heard is this is an issue which is not confined to individual hospital trusts and is based on the ability of technology to 'talk to each other' across various NHS services Given Sunderland Royal Hospital is regional centre for penile cancer it means patients are treated there who are not in the usual catchment area for the trust, and as such situations such as this with patients living out of the area must occur regularly.

Responses

1 respondent
NHS England NHS / Health Body
21 May 2025 PDF
Action Taken

NHS England highlights the Frontline Digitisation Programme to improve information sharing, and the STSFT is conducting a clinician review of discharge processes with findings to be shared with the ICB and NHS England; the NHFT has started an audit of communication arrangements and implemented a hub model to support clinical triage. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Thompson, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Malcolm Morris who died on 5 January 2024.

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 21 May 2025 concerning the death of Malcolm Morris on 5 January 2024. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Malcolm’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Malcolm’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

Your report raises concerns around disjointed communication between hospital and community healthcare systems across different geographical areas and the impact this has on the efficiency of referrals to district nursing services.

My response has been informed by engagement with NHS England’s North East and Yorkshire regional colleagues, NHS Pathways and National Patient Safety colleagues.

NHS England recognises that limited information sharing between care settings can contribute to delays in discharge, incomplete handovers and less effective continuity of care, particularly when patients receive support across organisational or geographical boundaries.

Over the past three years, NHS England has developed and led ‘The Frontline Digitisation’ (FLD) Programme, which has supported trusts in adopting electronic patient record (EPR) systems, and which nationally supports increased consistency in digital maturity and improves information sharing between and within organisations.

The FLD Programme not only enables organisations to purchase EPRs but also advises on safe and effective deployment. However, whilst FLD enhances local digital capabilities, interoperability (i.e. how different digital systems communicate with one another) is typically configured and managed at a local level, rather than being led nationally by NHS England. This will be based on local arrangements between provider organisations and regional centres, will be cognisant of the wider catchment area and will depend on the range of technology suppliers. As such, interoperability will vary depending on local infrastructure and information governance arrangements. Co-National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

21 July 2025

For safety reasons, the deployment of digital clinical systems, of which the EPR is one, requires health provider organisations to employ Clinical Safety Officers who undertake a full and detailed risk assessment regarding their deployment. Implementation plans should clearly state how certain circumstances, such as those described in this case, should be managed. All healthcare provider organisations continue to have the need to be able to respond to all types of information flows (digital and paper) into and out of their organisation as they frequently work with, for example, smaller health and social care organisations,
e.g. hospices who are yet be digitised. In other words, every digitised organisation needs to be able to receive and send care information in both digitised and non- digitised formats. Managing this is integral to the safe design of patient pathways and how a hospital discharges its care responsibilities, regardless of whether these care pathways are local, regional or national services. For information, the Sunderland Royal Hospital, part of South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust (STSFT), already has an EPR that meets the FLD Programme’s core standards and has received funding as part of the FLD Programme to support optimisation of their EPR. Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust’s (NHFT’s) EPR had not met the FLD Programme’s core standards and has therefore received funding as part of the Programme to extend functionality.

Both trusts are part of The Great North Care Record (GNCR), which shares healthcare data which should be available at the point of care. The type of information typically available on the GNCR includes - Clinical correspondence, Alerts, Appointments, Cellular pathology and Allergies.

To further support more consistent interoperability across the NHS, NHS England has developed the ‘Booking and Referral Standard’ (BaRS), which is a national framework designed to help digitise and standardise referrals and bookings across care settings, including urgent and emergency care (UEC), general practice, hospital, and community services.

BaRS is still in the very early stages of implementation, but it offers a significant opportunity to improve information flow, reduce missed handovers, and support timelier and coordinated discharges. Realising the full benefits of BaRS will require broad adoption across the health and care system, including provider engagement and supplier integration. This means that progress may be complex, slow, and shaped by wider policy, operational capacity, and investment considerations.

In the meantime, it remains essential that hospitals and local health systems have clear, clinically safe fallback processes for when digital interoperability is not yet in place, including robust discharge summaries and communication protocols to support safe, joined-up care.

Colleagues from our North East and Yorkshire regional team have been in touch with STSFT, who recognise that whilst your Report was issued to NHS England, there is still learning for the Trust in terms of improving discharge and referral processes for

outside of area patients. In response, their Incident Review Group recently commissioned a clinician review to look into the circumstances of Malcolm’s hospital discharge and identify any necessary improvements. Once the learning has been established the report will be shared with North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board (ICB), with findings and/or any emerging actions to then be shared with NHS England.

NHFT acknowledges the challenges that the different digital infrastructures in place have on the quality of discharge arrangements, particularly when outside of their area. The Trust has commenced an audit of their Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) communication arrangements and has put in place a new hub model to better support clinical triage.

I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Malcolm, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 17th July 2024 | commenced an investigation into the death of Malcolm Morris, 63 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 16th August 2025_ Theconclusion ofuthe inquest was that Malcolm Morris died on Sth January 2024 Northumberland. A narrative conclusion was recorded. The medical cause of death was 1a Pulmonary Embolism 1b Ic Id Lymphoedema complicating right Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Squamous Cell Carcinoma plus Obesity
Circumstances of the death
Mr Morris was diagnosed with penile cancer in 2023 and underwent necessary surgery to remove it; he suffered with repeated infections which required further treatment & surgery to address this_ In July 2023 he had right inguinal node dissection to arrest the spread of the cancer He was seen to be infection free by November 2023. He was seen post operatively to develop Iymphoedema which is recognised complication of the surgery. He was referred for treatment of the lymphedema: This amongst other treatments required the wearing of compression garments. At an assessment of his lymphoedema on 3rd January 2024 his right thigh was seen to be swollen. On examination the compression garment was not located in way that applied pressure to his right thigh. He displayed no symptoms suggestive of a deep vein thrombosis including pain. It is not possible on the evidence to say if a deep vein thrombosis was present at that time On Sth January 2024 after complaining of pain in his right thigh he collapsed and died. His death was due to a pulmonary embolism which is a naturally occurring disease running its full course and resulting in his death
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe your organisation have the power to take such action:

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2025-0239
Date of report
21 May 2025
Coroner
John Thompson
Coroner area
Northumberland

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 16 Jul 2025 (estimated).

Sent to

NHS England

Source links