Home/ Public Inquiries/ Angiolini Inquiry/ Parliamentary activity
Public inquiry · Parliamentary scrutiny

Parliamentary activity

Angiolini Inquiry. Read indexed debates, questions, statements and early day motions, with links to the original parliamentary records.

43 indexed mentions for this inquiry Earliest recorded mention: 7 December 2021
Clear all filters
Member: Lord Kempsell · Clear member

Parliamentary mentions

1 matching mention · newest first

Police: Recruitment

Written Question House of Lords
Lord Kempsell · Conservative Answering body: Home Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to The Angiolini Inquiry: Part 1 Report published on 29 February, which territorial and national police forces outsource their recruitment vetting to other police forces or other law enforcement agencies.

Government answer

Answering body: Home Office

All Home Office (territorial) forces in England and Wales conduct their recruitment vetting internally.

This is also the case for all non-Home Office national police forces, aside from the Royal Military Police who are assisted by Warwickshire Police for vetting checks.

The Part 1 report of Angiolini’s Inquiry highlighted that in 2010, the Civil Nuclear Constabulary had outsourced its force vetting to Thames Valley Police. They now carry out their own recruitment vetting.

Original parliamentary record