Public Inquiry
Leveson Inquiry
Status: Completed
Chair: Lord Justice Leveson
Established: Jul 2011
Report: Nov 2012
Commissioned by: Cabinet Office
The Leveson Inquiry examined the culture, practices and ethics of the British press following the News International phone hacking scandal. Part 1 made 92 recommendations on press regulation, data protection, police-media relations, and media plurality. Many recommendations were not implemented; …
Response breakdown
Blanket response: PM David Cameron responded to all 92 recommendations with a single statement accepting them "in principle" or "in part". No per-recommendation response was published.
Evidence & impact
The Leveson Inquiry was established in November 2011 following revelations about phone hacking and other press misconduct. Lord Justice Leveson's report, published on 29 November 2012, made 92 recommendations covering press regulation, data protection, police-press relations, and media plurality.
The government's response was mixed. The Prime Minister stated on 29 November 2012 that he accepted "the principles that Lord Justice Leveson has laid out" for independent self-regulation but rejected statutory underpinning, expressing "serious concerns and misgivings" about crossing "the Rubicon of writing elements of press regulation into the law of the land." Of the 92 recommendations, the government accepted 19 (21%), accepted in principle 58 (63%), and did not accept 15 (16%).
The government's legislative response centred on establishing the Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press (October 2013) and passing the Crime and Courts Act 2013. This created an alternative to Leveson's recommended statutory framework. The Press Recognition Panel was established under the Charter, though no major news publisher has joined a recognised regulator.
Specific reforms that followed include: the Data Protection Act 2018 incorporating some Leveson recommendations, including compensation for distress without pecuniary loss and requiring the ICO to produce a journalism code of practice; the College of Policing publishing guidance on media relations; and continued publication of ministerial transparency data.
However, a key provision - Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013, which would have created costs incentives for joining a recognised regulator - was never commenced and was repealed in 2024. The government stated this was because "this recommendation was contingent on a costs incentive framework that no longer exists."
Published evidence of progress is limited. Records indicate that 77 of the 92 recommendations (84%) remain listed as "Awaiting Action" with no documented evidence of implementation thirteen years after the report's publication.
The government's response was mixed. The Prime Minister stated on 29 November 2012 that he accepted "the principles that Lord Justice Leveson has laid out" for independent self-regulation but rejected statutory underpinning, expressing "serious concerns and misgivings" about crossing "the Rubicon of writing elements of press regulation into the law of the land." Of the 92 recommendations, the government accepted 19 (21%), accepted in principle 58 (63%), and did not accept 15 (16%).
The government's legislative response centred on establishing the Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press (October 2013) and passing the Crime and Courts Act 2013. This created an alternative to Leveson's recommended statutory framework. The Press Recognition Panel was established under the Charter, though no major news publisher has joined a recognised regulator.
Specific reforms that followed include: the Data Protection Act 2018 incorporating some Leveson recommendations, including compensation for distress without pecuniary loss and requiring the ICO to produce a journalism code of practice; the College of Policing publishing guidance on media relations; and continued publication of ministerial transparency data.
However, a key provision - Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013, which would have created costs incentives for joining a recognised regulator - was never commenced and was repealed in 2024. The government stated this was because "this recommendation was contingent on a costs incentive framework that no longer exists."
Published evidence of progress is limited. Records indicate that 77 of the 92 recommendations (84%) remain listed as "Awaiting Action" with no documented evidence of implementation thirteen years after the report's publication.
Reports & milestones
Reports
29 Nov 2012
92 tracked recs
An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press
· Tracked recommendations
· PDF
29 Nov 2012
0 tracked recs
An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press - Volume I
· PDF
29 Nov 2012
0 tracked recs
An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press - Volume II
· PDF
29 Nov 2012
0 tracked recs
An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press - Volume III
· PDF
29 Nov 2012
0 tracked recs
An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press - Volume IV
· PDF
Timeline
13 Jul 2011
Inquiry Announced
14 Nov 2011
Inquiry Establish…
29 Nov 2012
Final Report Publ…
Recommendations
| Code | Recommendation | Addressed to | Response | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L25 |
In any reconsideration of the powers of the Information Commissioner (or replacement body), power should be given to that body to determine …
|
Information Commissioner | Not Accepted | View → |
| L26 |
It should be open any subscriber to a recognised regulatory body to rely on the fact of such membership and on the …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L48 |
The exemption in section 32 of the Data Protection Act 1998 should be amended so as to make it available only where: …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L49 |
The exemption in section 32 of the Data Protection Act 1998 should be narrowed in scope, so that it no longer allows, …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L51 |
The procedural provisions of the Data Protection Act 1998 with special application to journalism in: (a) section 32(4) and (5) (b) sections …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L53 |
Specific provision should be made to the effect that, in considering the exercise of any of its powers in relation to the …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L54 |
The necessary steps should be taken to bring into force the amendments made to section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998 …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L55 |
The prosecution powers of the Information Commissioner should be extended to include any offence which also constitutes a breach of the data …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L57 |
The opportunity should be taken to consider amending the Data Protection Act 1998 formally to reconstitute the Information Commissioner's Office as an …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L67 |
On the basis that the provisions of s77-78 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 are brought into effect, so that …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L68 |
The Home Office should consider and, if necessary, consult upon: (a) whether paragraph 2(b) of Schedule 1 to the Police and Criminal …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L70 |
The Civil Justice Council should consider the level of damages in privacy, breach of confidence and data protection cases, being prepared to …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L71 |
The Report of the Law Commission on Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary Damages should be adopted in relation to its recommendations that legislation …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L73 |
The Civil Procedure Rules should be amended to require the court, when considering the appropriate order for costs at the conclusion of …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
| L74 |
In the absence of the provision of an approved mechanism for dispute resolution, available through an independent regulator without cost to the …
|
UK Government | Not Accepted | View → |
Parliamentary activity
6 debates
63 questions
8 statements
01 Jun 2026
Written Question
Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press Inquiry
Ian Sollom (Liberal Democrat)
Ian Sollom (Liberal Democrat)
05 Jan 2026
Written Question
Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press Inquiry
Catherine West (Labour)
Catherine West (Labour)