Public inquiry · Parliamentary scrutiny

Parliamentary activity

Infected Blood Inquiry. Read indexed debates, questions, statements and early day motions, with links to the original parliamentary records.

394 indexed mentions for this inquiry Earliest recorded mention: 15 March 1990

Parliamentary mentions

4 matching mentions · newest first

Infected Blood Compensation Scheme

Written Question House of Lords
Baroness Featherstone · Liberal Democrat Answering body: Cabinet Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they gave to the treatment of estates in the consultation on the proposed changes to the infected blood compensation scheme which ended on 22 January.

Government answer

Answering body: Cabinet Office

On 30 October, the Government launched a public consultation on proposed changes to the infected blood compensation scheme. The Government particularly welcomes responses from those in the infected blood community, including estate representatives, and family members who sadly have lost a loved one due to the use of infected blood, or infected blood products.

Some of the proposals set out in the consultation will have an impact on claims made by estate representatives, on behalf of a deceased infected person. The consultation focused on the areas recommended by the Infected Blood Inquiry in its Additional Report. It also asked whether a respondent would like to raise other issues around the compensation scheme that may not have been addressed in the Additional Report.

The Government is carefully considering responses to the consultation, which closed on 22 January. The Minister for the Cabinet Office hopes to update Parliament soon on the changes the Government intends to make to the compensation scheme, as a result of the public consultation.

Original parliamentary record

Blood: Contamination

Written Question House of Lords
Baroness Featherstone · Liberal Democrat Answering body: Cabinet Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to introducing a tax on companies which benefited from (1) the research conducted on British infected blood victims, and (2) the drugs used to treat infected blood patients; and what assessment they have made of the benefits and risks of taxing those companies.

Government answer

Answering body: Cabinet Office

The Infected Blood Inquiry recommended that a compensation scheme be set up as soon as possible, and by centrally funding the scheme, the Government has been able quickly allocate the money necessary.

The Government firmly believes that access to redress is fundamental in upholding justice and fairness in our society. People must have avenues to seek recourse when they have been wronged or harmed. We hope the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme provides some closure to those who have been wronged under some of those most devastating circumstances.

Original parliamentary record

Infected Blood Inquiry

Written Question House of Lords
Baroness Featherstone · Liberal Democrat Answering body: Cabinet Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask His Majesty's Government, with regard to page 60 of the Infected Blood Inquiry's second interim report, published on 5 April, what work they have been done to register those eligible for interim compensation payments with existing support schemes, before the final report is published.

Government answer

Answering body: Cabinet Office

The Government continues to make progress with the work necessary to enable a response to the full report when it is published in March next year. It is only reasonable that the Inquiry, whose work is in train, concludes and provides their final recommendations before the Government takes action. The Government recognises that there is interest in pre-registration for compensation ahead of its response to the Inquiry’s final report. However, as the Minister for the Cabinet Office set out to the Inquiry in July, opening registration for compensation before the Government has finalised its response would be a difficult step to take.

Original parliamentary record

Infected Blood Inquiry

Written Question House of Lords
Baroness Featherstone · Liberal Democrat Answering body: Cabinet Office
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask His Majesty's Government what is their response to recommendation 18 of the Infected Blood Inquiry's second interim report, published on 5 April, that a compensation scheme should be set up now and it should begin work this year.

Government answer

Answering body: Cabinet Office

The Government continues to make progress with the work necessary to enable a response to the full report when it is published in March next year. It is only reasonable that the Inquiry, whose work is in train, concludes and provides their final recommendations before the Government takes action. The Government recognises that there is interest in pre-registration for compensation ahead of its response to the Inquiry’s final report. However, as the Minister for the Cabinet Office set out to the Inquiry in July, opening registration for compensation before the Government has finalised its response would be a difficult step to take.

Original parliamentary record