Public inquiry · Parliamentary scrutiny

Parliamentary activity

Falkland Islands Review Committee. Read indexed debates, questions, statements and early day motions, with links to the original parliamentary records.

4 indexed mentions for this inquiry Earliest recorded mention: 1 July 1958

Parliamentary mentions

3 matching mentions · newest first

Prosecutions

Written Question House of Commons
Caroline Lucas · Green Party Answering body: Attorney General
Parliamentary excerpt

To ask the Attorney General, with reference to his power to grant his consent to a prosecution, whether he is required to make that decision in accordance with the 1972 Franks Committee memorandum criteria of (a) whether the charge is being brought in appropriate circumstances, (b) the five reasons for the requirement of consent, as set out in that memorandum and (c) the mischief at which the criminal law in question was addressed.

Government answer

Answering body: Attorney General

For certain offences, Parliament has decided that the Attorney General’s consent is needed to bring a prosecution.

The Home Office memorandum to the Franks Committee in 1972 gave guidance on the reasons for including a consent requirement when creating a criminal offence. It provided that the basic reason for including a consent requirement is that otherwise there would be a risk of prosecutions being brought in inappropriate circumstances and identified five broader overlapping reasons for including a consent requirement.

It is a constitutional principle that, when deciding whether to consent to a prosecution, the Law Officers will consider all relevant facts including why it is proposed to bring the prosecution and the mischief which the proposed offence was intended to prevent and apply the well-established prosecution principles of evidential sufficiency and the public interest test.

Original parliamentary record

COMMITTEE TO REVIEW INTELLIGENCE ON WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

Early Day Motion House of Commons
Glenda Jackson · Labour
Parliamentary excerpt

That this House, concerned at the lack of confidence in the Franks Inquiry, its methods, report, thoroughness, displayed by the Foreign Secretary during the debate on Iraq on 22nd October 2003, Official Report, column 682, and mindful that the committee to review intelligence on weapons of mass destruction will follow the precedent in terms of procedures of that Franks Committee, calls upon the Prime Minister to review both remit and procedures of the newly formed committee to ensure it has t...

Original parliamentary record