Source · Select Committees · Education Committee

Second Report - Teacher recruitment, training and retention

Education Committee HC 119 Published 17 May 2024
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
69 items (18 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 69 of 69 classified
Accepted 28
Accepted in Part 7
Acknowledged 12
Deferred 16
Not Addressed 3
Rejected 3
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations

3 results
12 Rejected

Expand teacher retention payments according to subject and regional demand, reviewing eligibility.

Recommendation
We welcome the initial success of existing retention payments such as the Levelling Up Premium and Early Career Payments. The Department should expand the Levelling Up Premium and Early Career Payments according to subject and regional demand. We have heard … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government implicitly rejects the recommendation to expand the Levelling Up Premium and Early Career Payments, citing challenging fiscal circumstances and the need to make difficult funding decisions.
Department for Education
View Details →
47 Rejected
Para 197

Reinstate funding for subject knowledge enhancement programmes in five axed subjects.

Recommendation
We strongly disagree with the Department’s decision to axe five subject options from the Department’s subject knowledge enhancement programme offering. Subject knowledge enhancement programmes are crucial in closing knowledge gaps to allow more people to teach in shortages subjects. We … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government has rejected the recommendation to reinstate funding for the axed SKE subjects, stating that funding is focused on subjects with the greatest sufficiency challenges. It confirms a further review of the SKE package will be undertaken for future years.
Department for Education
View Details →
65 Rejected
Para 261

Define parameters of schools' responsibilities and ensure accessible wraparound support for pupils and parents.

Recommendation
We recommend the Department clearly defines the parameters of schools’ and teachers’ responsibilities. To support with issues that are not within the scope of schools’ responsibilities Wraparound support should be easily available and accessible. Schools and teachers should be able … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to clearly define school and teacher responsibilities, stating it would not be helpful due to complexity. It mentions a Child Poverty Taskforce and existing SEND reforms but does not address the need for easily available wraparound support and signposting.
Department for Education
View Details →