Select committee: Education Committee

Conclusion 17

4th Report - Children’s social care Published 10 Jul 2025 Addressed to Department for Education
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Too many children are being sent many miles from home, which has a traumatic and lasting impact on their lives. We were saddened to hear that a care-experienced young person had chosen not to pursue higher education as a direct result of being placed out of area. However, there are some strong examples of good practice and some local authorities have worked hard to limit the numbers of children placed out of area. (Conclusion, Paragraph 44)

From: Education Committee, 4th Report - Children’s social care (HC 430), 10 July 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 17 October 2025 (deadline 10 September 2025).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says its reform programme, backed by investment of "over £2 billion", addresses many of the Committee's concerns, and accepts some recommendations while declining others such as a national sufficiency strategy.

  • On out-of-area placements and sufficiency, it does "not believe a national sufficiency strategy would be responsive enough" to local needs, and says national reporting of reasons for out-of-area placements would be "costly" to local authorities.
  • On a profit cap, it would consider one "only if" other measures are not successful, and "can commit to consulting specifically with the Committee" as part of the process.
  • On kinship care, it does not currently plan to extend Pupil Premium Plus or admissions priority, citing "limited evidence", but is exploring collecting data through the school census.
  • On a national register of foster carers, it is "considering the potential costs and benefits" and will engage stakeholders to "determine next steps".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error