Source · Select Committees · Defence Committee

Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain

Defence Committee HC 699 Published 14 February 2021
Government response
Fifth Special Report: Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain: Government Response to the Committee's Fourth Report of Session 2019–21 · published 27 Apr 2021
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index

Recommendations & Conclusions

14 items
2 Conclusion
Para 13

As a result of the Ministry of Defence’s approach of encouraging inward investment, foreign involvement...

Conclusion
As a result of the Ministry of Defence’s approach of encouraging inward investment, foreign involvement in the UK defence supply chain is widespread, with the UK hosting a broad range of UK-based and international suppliers. This approach has brought many benefits to the UK defence industry and wider economy.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
3 Conclusion
Para 23

If the Ministry of Defence has the level of oversight of the defence supply chain...

Conclusion
If the Ministry of Defence has the level of oversight of the defence supply chain that it claims, then it is clear that it was aware of purchases by Chinese companies into the UK defence supply chain and decided that such involvement was an acceptable risk. We do not agree.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
4 Recommendation
Para 24

The Ministry of Defence should assess the implications of Chinese ownership of the companies listed...

Recommendation
The Ministry of Defence should assess the implications of Chinese ownership of the companies listed within this report.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
5 Recommendation
Para 27

The Ministry of Defence’s open and country-agnostic approach to foreign involvement means that the defence...

Recommendation
The Ministry of Defence’s open and country-agnostic approach to foreign involvement means that the defence supply chain has been open to potentially hostile foreign involvement, with reports of companies being owned and influenced by foreign Governments whose values and behaviours are at odds with our own and who are known to engage in intellectual property theft. The Ministry of Defence should publish a list of countries it Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain 31 considers friendly and from whom investment should be encouraged. All those countries falling outside of this list should be barred from investing in the UK’s defence supply chain, including China and Russia.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
6 Recommendation
Para 29

Recent reports have highlighted the purchase of second-hand Chinese equipment by the Ministry of Defence.

Recommendation
Recent reports have highlighted the purchase of second-hand Chinese equipment by the Ministry of Defence. This is deeply concerning. The purchase of equipment from China for use by the Armed Forces should not be considered a viable option by the Ministry of Defence.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
7 Recommendation
Para 32

The relative indifference of the Ministry of Defence to the possible relocation of General Electric’s...

Recommendation
The relative indifference of the Ministry of Defence to the possible relocation of General Electric’s Rugby facility was concerning. We are pleased that this important industrial capacity ultimately remained in the UK. The Ministry of Defence should prioritise the maintenance of sovereign capability within the UK defence industry.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
8 Conclusion
Para 41

The UK previously lacked foreign direct investment screening legislation which left the defence supply chain,...

Conclusion
The UK previously lacked foreign direct investment screening legislation which left the defence supply chain, alongside other sectors of the UK’s economy, vulnerable to influence from hostile foreign investors. The National Security and Investment Bill, once law, will change this situation and offer greater protection to the UK’s economy. Alongside industry and many expert commentators, we support the introduction of this Bill and the planned regime.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
9 Recommendation
Para 46

Some commentators have questioned the placement of the ‘Investment Security Unit’ within the Department for...

Recommendation
Some commentators have questioned the placement of the ‘Investment Security Unit’ within the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, suggesting that it does not have the necessary expertise and knowledge. We are content, however, that the unit will be able to draw on experience across Whitehall. The Ministry of Defence, alongside other departments and agencies, should proactively feed into all relevant assessment processes.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
10 Conclusion
Para 50

Venture capitalism helps to drive innovation in defence and associated industries.

Conclusion
Venture capitalism helps to drive innovation in defence and associated industries. However, we heard concerns that venture capitalist funding could represent an avenue for hostile foreign investors to gain entry into the UK defence supply chain. The Minister for Business and Industry told us that the National Security and Investment Bill legislates in this area to protect national security-sensitive entities.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
11 Conclusion
Para 55

The new regime’s impact on foreign direct investment is, as yet, uncertain.

Conclusion
The new regime’s impact on foreign direct investment is, as yet, uncertain. If implemented efficiently the new regime should have little to no harmful impact on foreign direct investment to the UK defence supply chain, only preventing investment that is undesirable.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
12 Conclusion
Para 59

The defence industry in the UK has remained broadly resilient in the face of financial...

Conclusion
The defence industry in the UK has remained broadly resilient in the face of financial pressures resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for all businesses within the defence supply chain, particularly those that also operate in commercial aerospace and are small 32 Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain and medium sized enterprises. The financial vulnerability of such businesses could increase the risk of hostile foreign involvement in the defence supply chain.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
13 Recommendation
Para 66

The Ministry of Defence and wider Government have provided substantial support to businesses in the...

Recommendation
The Ministry of Defence and wider Government have provided substantial support to businesses in the defence supply chain. Unfortunately, we heard that this support has not always reached its intended beneficiaries or had the intended consequences. The Ministry of Defence should improve its communication strategy with small and medium sized enterprises to ensure that they are aware of the support that they are eligible for at this difficult time.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
14 Recommendation
Para 67

The commercial aerospace industry remains financially fragile.

Recommendation
The commercial aerospace industry remains financially fragile. The Ministry of Defence should already be aware of the close links between this industry and the defence supply chain and should consider what more it can do to support businesses which operate here, particularly small and medium sized enterprises.

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
15 Recommendation

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the supply chains of defence businesses as well as their finances.

Recommendation
The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the supply chains of defence businesses as well as their finances. Global supply chains for defence represent a vulnerability, especially when these supply chains include materials from countries not closely aligned with the UK. The Ministry of Defence should set out how it is proactively supporting efforts from defence businesses to seek domestic alternatives for supply and to shorten supply chains. (Paragraph 72) Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain 33 Sub-Committee Formal minutes Tuesday 9 February 2021 Members present: Richard Drax, in the Chair Stuart Anderson Sarah Atherton Martin Docherty-Hughes Rt Hon Tobias Ellwood Rt Hon Mr Mark Francois Gavin Robinson Rt Hon John Spellar Derek Twigg Minutes Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain Draft Report (Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain), proposed by the Chairman, brought up and read. Ordered, That the draft Report be read a second time, paragraph by paragraph. Paragraphs 1 to 72 read and agreed to. Summary agreed to. Resolved, That the Report be the Second Report of the Sub-Committee to the Committee in this session. Ordered, That the Chair make the Report to the Committee. Next meeting [Sub-Committee Adjourned 34 Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain Committee Formal Minutes Tuesday 9 February 2021 Members present: Rt Hon Tobias Ellwood, in the Chair Stuart Anderson Sarah Atherton Martin Docherty-Hughes Richard Drax Rt Hon Mr Mark Francois Gavin Robinson Rt Hon John Spellar Derek Twigg Minutes Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain Draft Report from the Sub-Committee (Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain), proposed by the Chairman, brought up and read. Ordered, That the draft Report be read a second time, paragraph by paragraph. Paragraphs 1 to 72 read and agreed to. Summary agreed to. Resolved, That the Report be the Fourth Report of the Committee to the House. Ordered, That the Chair make the Report to the House. Order

Link to this item

Ministry of Defence
View Details →
Report Status
Response document linked

Recorded deadline: 14 Apr 2021

Missing links do not establish that no response was published. A linked document does not verify responses to individual findings.

Conclusions & Recommendations
14 items (8 recs)

No response data available yet.