Select committee: Defence Committee
Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain
HC 699
Published 14 February 2021
Defence Committee Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain Report on parliament.uk ↗
At a glance8 recommendations and 6 conclusions · Government response published 27 April 2021 (deadline 14 April 2021)
The government's response
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.
The Government welcomes the Committee's report, agrees with parts of it, and maintains its existing risk-based, case-by-case approach to foreign investment in the defence supply chain.
- On a list of friendly countries, the Government "notes" the recommendation but considers its current "risk-based approach" "remains appropriate", with each case examined individually.
- On Chinese ownership, it "notes" the recommendation, says it has assessed and "will continue to assess" investments where there are national security concerns, and does not consider it appropriate to comment on individual past decisions.
- It welcomes the Committee's support for the National Security and Investment Bill, which it says will bring "new powers to modernise our investment screening regime".
- On communication with small and medium sized enterprises, it "will seek to further enhance related communications" and "plan[s] to publish a refreshed SME Action Plan later this year".
What the committee recommended 14
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
Sources
- Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain ↗The committee's report, HC 699, parliament.uk
- Fifth Special Report: Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain: Government Response to the Committee's Fourth Report of Session 2019–21 ↗The government's response, 27 April 2021, parliament.uk
Recommendations and conclusions 14
-
2
As a result of the Ministry of Defence’s approach of encouraging inward investment, foreign involvement... Conclusion (the committee's words)As a result of the Ministry of Defence’s approach of encouraging inward investment, foreign involvement in the UK defence supply chain is widespread, with the UK hosting a broad range of UK-based and international suppliers. This approach has brought many benefits to the UK defence industry and wider economy.
-
3
If the Ministry of Defence has the level of oversight of the defence supply chain... Conclusion (the committee's words)If the Ministry of Defence has the level of oversight of the defence supply chain that it claims, then it is clear that it was aware of purchases by Chinese companies into the UK defence supply chain and decided that such involvement was an acceptable risk. We do not agree.
-
4
The Ministry of Defence should assess the implications of Chinese ownership of the companies listed... Recommendation (the committee's words)The Ministry of Defence should assess the implications of Chinese ownership of the companies listed within this report.
-
5
The Ministry of Defence’s open and country-agnostic approach to foreign involvement means that the defence... Recommendation (the committee's words)The Ministry of Defence’s open and country-agnostic approach to foreign involvement means that the defence supply chain has been open to potentially hostile foreign involvement, with reports of companies being owned and influenced by foreign Governments whose values and behaviours are at odds with our own and who are known to engage in intellectual property theft. The Ministry of Defence should publish a list of countries it Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain 31 considers friendly and from whom investment should be encouraged. All those countries falling outside of this list should be barred from investing in the UK’s defence supply chain, including China and Russia.
-
6
Recent reports have highlighted the purchase of second-hand Chinese equipment by the Ministry of Defence. Recommendation (the committee's words)Recent reports have highlighted the purchase of second-hand Chinese equipment by the Ministry of Defence. This is deeply concerning. The purchase of equipment from China for use by the Armed Forces should not be considered a viable option by the Ministry of Defence.
-
7
The relative indifference of the Ministry of Defence to the possible relocation of General Electric’s... Recommendation (the committee's words)The relative indifference of the Ministry of Defence to the possible relocation of General Electric’s Rugby facility was concerning. We are pleased that this important industrial capacity ultimately remained in the UK. The Ministry of Defence should prioritise the maintenance of sovereign capability within the UK defence industry.
-
8
The UK previously lacked foreign direct investment screening legislation which left the defence supply chain,... Conclusion (the committee's words)The UK previously lacked foreign direct investment screening legislation which left the defence supply chain, alongside other sectors of the UK’s economy, vulnerable to influence from hostile foreign investors. The National Security and Investment Bill, once law, will change this situation and offer greater protection to the UK’s economy. Alongside industry and many expert commentators, we support the introduction of this Bill and the planned regime.
-
9
Some commentators have questioned the placement of the ‘Investment Security Unit’ within the Department for... Recommendation (the committee's words)Some commentators have questioned the placement of the ‘Investment Security Unit’ within the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, suggesting that it does not have the necessary expertise and knowledge. We are content, however, that the unit will be able to draw on experience across Whitehall. The Ministry of Defence, alongside other departments and agencies, should proactively feed into all relevant assessment processes.
-
10
Venture capitalism helps to drive innovation in defence and associated industries. Conclusion (the committee's words)Venture capitalism helps to drive innovation in defence and associated industries. However, we heard concerns that venture capitalist funding could represent an avenue for hostile foreign investors to gain entry into the UK defence supply chain. The Minister for Business and Industry told us that the National Security and Investment Bill legislates in this area to protect national security-sensitive entities.
-
11
The new regime’s impact on foreign direct investment is, as yet, uncertain. Conclusion (the committee's words)The new regime’s impact on foreign direct investment is, as yet, uncertain. If implemented efficiently the new regime should have little to no harmful impact on foreign direct investment to the UK defence supply chain, only preventing investment that is undesirable.
-
12
The defence industry in the UK has remained broadly resilient in the face of financial... Conclusion (the committee's words)The defence industry in the UK has remained broadly resilient in the face of financial pressures resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for all businesses within the defence supply chain, particularly those that also operate in commercial aerospace and are small 32 Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain and medium sized enterprises. The financial vulnerability of such businesses could increase the risk of hostile foreign involvement in the defence supply chain.
-
13
The Ministry of Defence and wider Government have provided substantial support to businesses in the... Recommendation (the committee's words)The Ministry of Defence and wider Government have provided substantial support to businesses in the defence supply chain. Unfortunately, we heard that this support has not always reached its intended beneficiaries or had the intended consequences. The Ministry of Defence should improve its communication strategy with small and medium sized enterprises to ensure that they are aware of the support that they are eligible for at this difficult time.
-
14
The commercial aerospace industry remains financially fragile. Recommendation (the committee's words)The commercial aerospace industry remains financially fragile. The Ministry of Defence should already be aware of the close links between this industry and the defence supply chain and should consider what more it can do to support businesses which operate here, particularly small and medium sized enterprises.
-
15
The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the supply chains of defence businesses as well as their finances. Recommendation (the committee's words)The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the supply chains of defence businesses as well as their finances. Global supply chains for defence represent a vulnerability, especially when these supply chains include materials from countries not closely aligned with the UK. The Ministry of Defence should set out how it is proactively supporting efforts from defence businesses to seek domestic alternatives for supply and to shorten supply chains.