Select committee: Defence Committee
Recommendation 7
Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain
Published 14 Feb 2021
Paragraph 32
Addressed to Ministry of Defence
Defence Committee Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The relative indifference of the Ministry of Defence to the possible relocation of General Electric’s Rugby facility was concerning. We are pleased that this important industrial capacity ultimately remained in the UK. The Ministry of Defence should prioritise the maintenance of sovereign capability within the UK defence industry.
From: Defence Committee, Foreign Involvement in the Defence Supply Chain (HC 699), paragraph 32, 14 February 2021
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 27 April 2021 (deadline 14 April 2021).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The Government welcomes the Committee's report, agrees with parts of it, and maintains its existing risk-based, case-by-case approach to foreign investment in the defence supply chain.
- On a list of friendly countries, the Government "notes" the recommendation but considers its current "risk-based approach" "remains appropriate", with each case examined individually.
- On Chinese ownership, it "notes" the recommendation, says it has assessed and "will continue to assess" investments where there are national security concerns, and does not consider it appropriate to comment on individual past decisions.
- It welcomes the Committee's support for the National Security and Investment Bill, which it says will bring "new powers to modernise our investment screening regime".
- On communication with small and medium sized enterprises, it "will seek to further enhance related communications" and "plan[s] to publish a refreshed SME Action Plan later this year".