Select committee: Defence Committee

Conclusion 19

6th Report - The UK contribution to European Security Published 19 Nov 2025 Addressed to Ministry of Defence
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The defence industrial base has been subject to numerous reviews, plans and strategies, all of which have identified recommendations. However, many of those have only been partially implemented. Whilst the Government appears to be committed to solving some of the most intractable issues, it is too early at this point to judge the progress of these measures let alone their effectiveness. (Conclusion, Paragraph 84)

From: Defence Committee, 6th Report - The UK contribution to European Security (HC 520), 19 November 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 30 January 2026 (deadline 19 January 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government's response to the Defence Committee's report on the UK contribution to European security outlines its approach under a 'NATO First' strategy, setting out many ongoing measures and deferring several decisions to the forthcoming Defence Investment Plan.

  • On capability priorities, it says it is "considering where to prioritise investment", including UK involvement in EU capability development programmes, and that choices "will be detailed in the forthcoming Defence Investment Plan".
  • On a second sovereign nuclear delivery method, it states that a submarine-based system "remains the most effective and proportionate means" of delivering the deterrent, and that F-35A aircraft will "complement, rather than replace" it.
  • On a Minister of Homeland Security, it says it "continues to judge" that the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister and the Security Minister "remain suitable leads".
  • On Defence Readiness legislation, it is reviewing which powers may be needed and will engage stakeholders "during 2026", but says it does "not yet have a specific timetable" for the legislation.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error