Source · Select Committees · Defence Committee
Recommendation 10
10
Operation Isotrope’s potential to cause reputational damage to the Royal Navy (and even UK Defence...
Conclusion
Operation Isotrope’s potential to cause reputational damage to the Royal Navy (and even UK Defence as a whole) is significant. That risk comes from a number of areas: those who believe that this is not a defence task (but rather ought to be carried out by civil authorities); those who believe that the Royal Navy ought to have other, more pressing priorities; and those who believe that the Royal Navy is ineffective in the role, instead becoming a ‘taxi service’ for those crossing the Channel. This reputational damage could likely be countered by clear messaging of what the expectations are upon Royal Navy assets in the Channel and cross-Government agreement of the strategic objective of the operation. However, we have not seen any evidence that that will happen. (Paragraph 79) Conclusions
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government
Accepted
The Government accepts that countering small boats migration is a complex and challenging problem that requires a ‘whole of Government’ response. In announcing the policy, the MOD has been clear on the Royal Navy’s role and boundaries. Information on small boat crossings is published daily on GOV.UK.1