Select committee: Defence Committee

Conclusion 1

Fourth Report - Operation Isotrope: the use of the military to counter migrant crossings Published 11 Mar 2022 Paragraph 4 Addressed to Ministry of Defence
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The announcement of this policy appears to have been made prematurely. When the Government has been asked for details, it has consistently responded that these were being worked out. Announcing a policy before finalising the details is bad practice, particularly when that policy area is so sensitive. We question why such a premature announcement was made.

From: Defence Committee, Fourth Report - Operation Isotrope: the use of the military to counter migrant crossings (HC 1069), paragraph 4, 11 March 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 19 May 2022 (deadline 11 May 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response sets out military primacy for the Channel response as one element of wider immigration reform, notes some of the Committee's conclusions, and disagrees with others, including on the impact on naval resources.

  • On the call for a published handover date, it "notes the Committee's conclusions" and says current planning is for Defence to retain primacy until January 2023, when the "operational requirement and financing arrangements will be reviewed".
  • It "disagrees" with the Committee on the deployment of "scarce" naval resources, stating that Operation ISOTROPE "has no impact on the availability of Destroyers, Frigates or Batch 2 OPVs" for deployment overseas or in homeland defence.
  • On funding, it states that a £50 million package has been agreed between the Treasury, Home Office and MOD to deliver military primacy until early 2023, when "the requirement and resourcing will be reviewed".
  • On British shipbuilding, it "notes the Committee's recommendation" and says the National Shipbuilding Office "will seek to maximise UK content wherever possible".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error