Select committee: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee

Recommendation 4

Fifth Report - Creator remuneration Published 10 Apr 2024 Paragraph 40 Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The Government must ensure that creators have proper mechanisms to enforce their consent and receive fair compensation for use of their work by AI developers. It should set out measurable objectives for the period of engagement with the AI and rightsholders sectors, which it has said ministers will lead on, and provide a definitive deadline at which it will step in with legislation in order to break any deadlock. We will continue to monitor developments in this area and recommend that our successor Committee do the same next year.

From: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, Fifth Report - Creator remuneration (HC 156), paragraph 40, 10 April 2024

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 1 November 2024 (deadline 10 June 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the report but sets out a largely evidence-gathering and industry-led approach, with few firm commitments to the legislative or statutory measures the Committee recommended.

  • On a statutory private copying scheme, the government is "not ruling out" a private copying exception and levy, but "further evidence is needed"; the IPO will meet creative industries representatives on strengthening the evidence base.
  • On AI and copyright, the government "intend[s] to proceed carefully but with a degree of urgency" and "hope[s] to announce next steps soon". It does not set the deadline for legislation that the Committee sought.
  • On freelancers, it does not state a position on a Freelancers' Commissioner. A Good Work Review sub-group is "expected to discuss proposals" for one, and the five Good Work proposals are to be implemented "by March 2026".
  • On music streaming, its "current view" is that dialogue and "industry-led action" are best. It is confident the Working Group's membership is adequate and will "adapt the group if it feels it is necessary".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error